Ontario 'bribe' of $200 | Page 2 | Your stories | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Ontario 'bribe' of $200
February 1, 2025
9:51 am
savemoresaveoften
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3023
Member Since:
March 30, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

RetirEd said
Income taxes try to rebalance that by tiered rates rising with income levels.

Taxing at a higher % on a higher amount is basically "double" taxation. To "rebalance' the rich vs the poor is such a political blah blah. It's used to please the poor which is the majority of the voters...

February 1, 2025
10:40 am
cgouimet
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1563
Member Since:
February 7, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

RetirEd said

In the US, right now, we are seeing import tariffs - regressive taxes that cost the less wealthy a greater proportion of their income - being applied to enable major income tax cuts and corporate targeted cuts. Consumers pay for tariffs.  

The US Supreme Commander is banking on his loyal followers to remain intoxicated on his kool-aid for the next 4 years as he declares war on all their allies ....

CGO
February 1, 2025
1:11 pm
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4047
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

To suggest that consumers bear the burden of tariffs is not my view, far greater financial impact will be to the many working-age people (and their families) who will lose their jobs. Retired Boomers, who have had many decades to prepare for retirement, who suggest that having to pay a bit more for groceries, etc is the main problem tariffs cause strikes me as kind of Me Generation-ish.

February 1, 2025
6:27 pm
phrank
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 325
Member Since:
January 3, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bill said
To suggest that consumers bear the burden of tariffs is not my view, far greater financial impact will be to the many working-age people (and their families) who will lose their jobs. Retired Boomers, who have had many decades to prepare for retirement, who suggest that having to pay a bit more for groceries, etc is the main problem tariffs cause strikes me as kind of Me Generation-ish.  

I look forward to see who all the whiny babies blame for their hardships once the Boomers all pass on. I for one would like to thank all the Boomers who through their hard work built up a lot of the positive things we take for granted and are in the process of loosing through apathy at best.

February 2, 2025
1:12 pm
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4047
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

phrank, I can't disagree with your first point, though those "babies" are going to be much happier in a few years as they finally get their paws on the largest generational transfer of wealth in human history.

February 2, 2025
1:14 pm
Alexandre
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1269
Member Since:
November 8, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Many people think that this generational transfer is overrated, as seniors tend to spend money on themselves instead of passing it to the next, ungrateful, generation.

February 2, 2025
1:32 pm
HermanH
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1285
Member Since:
April 14, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Even if they spend their saved wealth instead of passing it directly to heirs, that accumulated value/wealth is still being drawn down and dispersed to the next generation via businesses.

February 2, 2025
5:45 pm
RetirEd
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1215
Member Since:
November 18, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

savemoresaveoften:

Taxing at a higher % on a higher amount is basically "double" taxation. To "rebalance' the rich vs the poor is such a political blah blah. It's used to please the poor which is the majority of the voters...

That word, I do not think it means what I think you think it means...

RetirEd

February 6, 2025
7:36 pm
COIN
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1181
Member Since:
March 15, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Did someone say or hint that the $200 "bribe" is taxable income? That means the "rich" will have to give back $106 in taxes.

February 6, 2025
7:59 pm
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1045
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

COIN said
Did someone say or hint that the $200 "bribe" is taxable income? That means the "rich" will have to give back $106 in taxes.  

It's a “tax rebate”. Not taxable.

February 8, 2025
7:25 am
COIN
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1181
Member Since:
March 15, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Sill waiting for my $200 "bribe". What's taking so long?

February 8, 2025
8:46 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7321
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The $200 Ontario tax rebates are being done by mailed paper cheques. Printing and mailing of cheques is not as fast as electronic direct deposits.

The distribution is still in progress. According to Toronto.com (February 8, 2025): Are you one of the millions of Ontarians still waiting…, about 11.76 million of the 15 million rebates have been issued so far.

February 8, 2025
10:22 am
Alexandre
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1269
Member Since:
November 8, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

HermanH said
Even if they spend their saved wealth instead of passing it directly to heirs, that accumulated value/wealth is still being drawn down and dispersed to the next generation via businesses.  

I like this. I am going to use this logic when buying bottle of Dalmore Whisky for myself to drink with my friends, instead of passing in the form of cash to heirs what did it cost me to buy it.

Whiskey.jpg

The Dalmore 45-Year-Old Highland Single Malt Scotch Whisky $47,000.00

February 12, 2025
6:20 pm
COIN
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1181
Member Since:
March 15, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

COIN said
Sill waiting for my $200 "bribe". What's taking so long?  

Got the cheque yesterday or the day before.

February 14, 2025
3:05 pm
zgic
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 170
Member Since:
August 30, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I got my $200 cheque but my wife did not. I checked the online status through service Ontario and it says 'Pending - Call xxx'. She has filed her taxes.
Anyone facing same issue? What could be the issue?

February 15, 2025
11:53 am
semi-retired
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 241
Member Since:
April 15, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

My wife got her check on Monday & mine showed up 2 days later.

February 15, 2025
12:07 pm
cgouimet
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1563
Member Since:
February 7, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

semi-retired said
My wife got her check on Monday & mine showed up 2 days later.  

My wife got hers Jan 30. Mine remains a work in progress.

CGO
February 15, 2025
1:48 pm
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4047
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I know two ladies, both married in the 1970s, who got their cheques issued in their maiden names, names not used since marriage. How?

And I thought I had the government news of the week. From CRA I had ordered 2 paper Ontario T3 returns and associated packages, this week's mail brought the 2 returns along with the 2012 (yes, 2012) T1 individuals' returns schedules booklets for Manitoba.

February 16, 2025
12:15 pm
COIN
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1181
Member Since:
March 15, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

zgic said
I got my $200 cheque but my wife did not. I checked the online status through service Ontario and it says 'Pending - Call xxx'. She has filed her taxes.
Anyone facing same issue? What could be the issue?  

I think the cheques are mailed alphabetically. Maybe the CRA think your name starts with a "Z".

No permission to create posts

Please write your comments in the forum.