TFSA successor holder form witness signature | Page 2 | Tax Free Savings Accounts | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
TFSA successor holder form witness signature
January 17, 2023
6:49 pm
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3111
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie said
It was Norman's post that referred to probate.  

Yes, I understood it was he who surfaced that comment. It was my intent, obviously poorly worded, to reinforce that an FI won't necessarily need to have a Will probated to release registered funds to a named beneficiary on file. It comes down to an FI's confidence on the validity of the Will being presented.

January 17, 2023
8:06 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7138
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie said
Really, the whole situation calls into question why we even have beneficiary forms. They are provided for in law so there must be some validity to them. If you are going to require a will probated regardless, then what's the point? I don't think the TFSA will be listed as an asset for probate because it's not subject to probate tax, although it could be mentioned. Perhaps the only use of the form would be for someone who didn't have a will, but how do you prove a negative and how long would the FI insist on waiting?

The TFSA issuer could wait for the probate court to issue letters of administration (instead of a grant of probate) that appoint an executor when there is no valid will. The letters of administration issued is court confirmation that no valid will was discovered.

The TFSA will be subject to probate tax if the probated will revokes the beneficiary or successor designation on the TFSA or the designation is ruled to be invalid.

These simple estate planning devices are never final. Not even joint accounts.

The surviving owner of a joint account can be compelled to turn the money over to the estate. If someone convinces probate court that the deceased did not intended the survivor to inherit the account on death, then the survivor is deemed to be holding the money in trust for the estate.

What is a Resulting Trust? is an interesting article from Toronto lawyers Wagner Sidlofsky LLP about joint ownership and the matter of resulting trust.

January 18, 2023
4:58 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3111
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I agree those are all possibilities depending on how messy one has left their affairs. It is not hard to understand why no one really wants to be an Executor.

January 18, 2023
2:24 pm
skibum
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 29
Member Since:
September 20, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I just sent in forms for Successor Annuitant for my RRIF at RBC. No witness needed. If my signature on a cheque, (which could empty the account) doesn't have to be witnessed, declaring a beneficiary, etc. should meet the same standard.

January 18, 2023
10:14 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9384
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

skibum said
I just sent in forms for Successor Annuitant for my RRIF at RBC. No witness needed. If my signature on a cheque, (which could empty the account) doesn't have to be witnessed, declaring a beneficiary, etc. should meet the same standard.  

One of the excuses they are giving for trying to eliminate cheques (a bad idea in my view) is the risk of forgery. However, it's more likely they find it too much bother to check signatures as that requires a human with eyes and brains.

No permission to create posts

Please write your comments in the forum.