6:09 am
September 7, 2018
8:44 am
September 30, 2017
How about OSFI web tools referenced previously by another member here ?
( OSFI - Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions )
1:27 pm
September 7, 2018
hwyc said
How about OSFI web tools referenced previously by another member here ?( OSFI - Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions )
That link did not work for me.
1:43 pm
December 12, 2009
OSFI financial data returns are session-based. They're not permalinked.
Scotiabank, unfortunately, chooses not to break out its Tangerine P/L and assets/liabilities as a separate business sub-segment of its Retail and Small Business Banking segment (which, in turn, is part of Canadian Banking and Wealth Management strategic business unit). So, yeah, we are left with only the OSFI returns.
Here's the most direct link to access:
http://www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca/Eng.....INDAT.aspx
P/L returns are posted quarterly, usually there is a 90-120 day lag time. Balance sheet returns are posted monthly, with a 1-2 month lag time.
To figure out annual profit, you have to view the Q1-Q4 returns and look on the Net Income line.
Cheers,
Doug
3:02 pm
September 7, 2018
Doug said
Here's the most direct link to access:
http://www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca/Eng.....INDAT.aspx
P/L returns are posted quarterly, usually there is a 90-120 day lag time. Balance sheet returns are posted monthly, with a 1-2 month lag time.
To figure out annual profit, you have to view the Q1-Q4 returns and look on the Net Income line.
Cheers,
Doug
Thanks very much, Doug. Exactly what I wanted.
The Q4 2018 Consolidated Statement of Income gave me the year to date (whole year) Net Income. No need to add up by quarter for past complete years.
Re 2019, I found it strange that the July 31-19 Balance Sheet shows only $5.5B "Mortgages Receivable" and $35B "Deposits Receivable from Financial Institutions". Total Assets were about $42B. Shareholders' Equity is very small relatively at about $2.2B. Information is not there how much in dividends the parent (Scotia) is drawing out of Tangerine.
Doug - Is it usual for a financial institution to have as its largest asset "Deposits Receivable from Financial Institutions."? Seems like Tangerine is gathering in funds (deposits) perhaps for use by Scotia to actually loan out.
3:48 pm
December 12, 2009
canadian.100 said
Thanks very much, Doug. Exactly what I wanted.
The Q4 2018 Consolidated Statement of Income gave me the year to date (whole year) Net Income. No need to add up by quarter for past complete years.
Re 2019, I found it strange that the July 31-19 Balance Sheet shows only $5.5B "Mortgages Receivable" and $35B "Deposits Receivable from Financial Institutions". Total Assets were about $42B. Shareholders' Equity is very small relatively at about $2.2B. Information is not there how much in dividends the parent (Scotia) is drawing out of Tangerine.
Doug - Is it usual for a financial institution to have as its largest asset "Deposits Receivable from Financial Institutions."? Seems like Tangerine is gathering in funds (deposits) perhaps for use by Scotia to actually loan out.
On your latter question/point, yes, I've posted about this before but no one really made any observational comments in reply. Ordinarily, deposits and loans match up fairly in sync with each other as the deposits serve as the primary funding source for the loans. Back when they were ING DIRECT Canada, they used to have a $15-20 billion mortgage book, as they were in the mortgage broker channel (they were also previously in the deposit broker channel, too!). However, almost immediately upon closing, one of Scotia's first orders of business was to put the bulk of the ING DIRECT Canada (now Tangerine) mortgage book into run-off such that, at renewal time, the brokers simply convinced their clients to switch their mortgages to another lender as (a) Tangerine mortgage rates were no longer competitive (they ceased offering rate specials and only offered posted rates well above market) and (b) they'd have to deal with Tangerine directly if they opted to renew. Tangerine's put a bit more emphasis into direct-to-consumer mortgages, but hasn't really moved the needle beyond the ~$5 billion they got down to.
So yeah, Scotia is definitely using Tangerine as, primarily, a funding source for their on-balance sheet lending. Tangerine's grown its staffing and spent more on deposits, marketing, offices, and the like, so profit-wise, it's probably underperformed Scotia's initial growth expectations but they still pull in ~$500 million in net income annually to Scotia's bottom line.
We don't know how much of that is paid in dividends, unless there's a separate cash flow return you can access, but realistically, I'd say Scotia is probably retaining ~50% on Tangerine's balance sheet as retained earnings, or transferring part of it to Scotia's balance sheet as retaining earnings (a form of regulatory capital), and transferring ~50% up to Scotia as dividends.
I'm surprised how separate Scotia keeps Tangerine...initially, they'd said they planned to keep it separate, but to me, I don't know why they don't, say, introduce a Tangerine Trade (a co-branded version of Scotia iTRADE) or something?
To the first point, historically, Q4 returns were only that: fourth quarter returns. But that's great if they've changed them to be YTD returns.
As for the shareholder equity, when they purchased Tangerine, it was around $3.5 billion, so I think they've also pulled out some of the retained earnings and transferred those up to Scotia as the mortgage book wound down and they were required to hold less capital.
Cheers,
Doug
5:45 am
September 7, 2018
If annual earnings are approx $500M and there is a relatively small amount of Retained Earnings ($2B or so), I would think Scotia is likely pulling out much more than 50% of the profits after all these years.
Scotia could put Tangerine in cash flow distress if it drains their cash resources, but guess that is highly unlikely.
11:46 am
September 30, 2017
6:17 am
September 30, 2017
... so OSFI monthly balance sheets are posted up to Jan 2020. The individuals deposits [Section II 1(d) 2 (d)] has been trending downwards for couple months.
. . . also noted the balance sheet size (asset/liability) shrinking in consecutive months
6:48 am
September 7, 2018
hwyc said
... so OSFI monthly balance sheets are posted up to Jan 2020. The individuals deposits [Section II 1(d) 2 (d)] has been trending downwards for couple months.
Are u sure deposits are trending downwards? Not according to the figures (in "000s") I see on the Balance Sheets on OSFI site. What figures are u using?
1d(i) - Jan 31-20 $7,128, 962 Jan 31-19 $6.639,348
1d(ii) - Jan 31-20 $22,083,466 Jan 31-19 $20,754,404
2d(i) - Jan 31 -20 $3,666,078 Jan 31-19 $3,518,540
1e and 2d(ii) are down a bit but 1d(i) and 1d(ii) are the significant figures.
11:19 am
December 12, 2009
Looking at the deposits doesn't indicate the strength of a bank, or even indicate whether they need deposits. Tangerine has always had far more deposits than it needs to fund its lending activities; since running off and selling its broker channel mortgage book a few years ago, it's been pretty constant at around $5 billion. Beyond that, they've added HELOCs, credit cards, and overdrafts. They've also added personal, unsecured LOCs to a very few select number of clients by invitation only, and that product has yet to officially launch.
Looking at deposits, or mortgages, in isolation is more of just a parlour game we play here, to see who is the largest or seeing the most growth in deposits or loans. Beyond that, it's not really that useful of a gauge for measuring financial health.
Cheers,
Doug
2:05 pm
September 30, 2017
canadian.100 said
Are u sure deposits are trending downwards? ...
Absolutely not. But I do want to find out if the crowd has been leaving or staying since the fees increased. Tangerine seems getting only negative rants in social media.
... Now I also want to know if any of these promotional offers actually boost their deposit amounts. Then wonder why if not.
Please write your comments in the forum.