Split out Wealthsimple rates by account type | Site suggestions | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Split out Wealthsimple rates by account type
January 6, 2025
7:21 pm
ProgTech
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
August 11, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hoping this hasn't been posted before. I don't use the site often and didn't see an easy way to search this specific forum.

With a quick glance at the HISA chart, Wealthsimple is currently #12 of 18 institutions on the chart at 2.25%, but this is only for Core clients (under $100K in total assets). The current rate for Premium clients ($100-500K) is 2.75%, and the rate for Generation clients ($500K+) is 3.25%, which puts it at #3 of 19 in the chart. With the current low rates, and extra .5% is significant. It would be nice to see the three levels broken out.

Not sure what kind of a can of worms this opens up regarding other institutions, but these are not promo rates.

https://www.wealthsimple.com/en-ca/pricing

January 6, 2025
8:44 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7291
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Should leave such $100,000+ and $500,000+ rates off the chart.

Don't want to see any institution in the future appear at the top of the chart by disingenuously offering a 4.25% HISA rate for $5,000,000+.sf-frown

January 6, 2025
8:54 pm
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1020
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Don’t think it’s “disingenuous”. $500K in investments isn’t particularly unusual and below median net worth. They also offer bumps in interest for depositing salary in their cash accounts.

Perhaps a footnote?

January 6, 2025
11:13 pm
everhopeful
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 206
Member Since:
September 28, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I agree with just having the base rate (first $ invested with no direct deposit or other requirements) on the chart, and the uprates be a footnote at most. If every uprate was included on the chart, it would become very cluttered, and would cease to be an apples-to-apples comparison.

January 6, 2025
11:34 pm
JohnnyCash
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 363
Member Since:
April 21, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

everhopeful said
I agree with just having the base rate (first $ invested with no direct deposit or other requirements) on the chart, and the bonuses be a footnote at most. If every bonus rate was included on the chart, it would become very cluttered, and would cease to be an apples-to-apples comparison.  

Yeah, better to only consider the base rate with a sidenote indicating any premiums on meeting deposit thresholds.

January 7, 2025
6:02 pm
Doug
British Columbia, Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4303
Member Since:
December 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

mordko said
Don’t think it’s “disingenuous”. $500K in investments isn’t particularly unusual and below median net worth. They also offer bumps in interest for depositing salary in their cash accounts.

Perhaps a footnote?  

A footnote could work, but I agree, we should be using the base rate everyone can get.

January 7, 2025
6:37 pm
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3193
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Agreed. Anything else would be just cheerleading. As I understand it, the chart is meant to reflect base vanilla HISAs everyone can get everyday.

Please write your comments in the forum.