PC, Tangerine, Zag, Zenbanx | Page 3 | Site suggestions | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
PC, Tangerine, Zag, Zenbanx
July 13, 2016
12:14 pm
Rigo_Daphne
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
December 18, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

But the comparison chart does more than just show the interest rates. I find the links very helpful. I've previously used your comparison chart (which I have bookmarked) as a jumping off point for all my savings research. I'd use the links to go to new companies or find out about accounts I might be interested. Now since you're not showing low interest companies, I can no longer use your links either to find out for myself what their interest rate is.
Please reinstate these companies, if for this reason alone.sf-embarassed

July 13, 2016
1:40 pm
NorthernRaven
Moderator
Moderators
Forum Posts: 678
Member Since:
August 4, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Nothing against Peter, and it's his site, but the selection criteria seems to be defeating the whole purpose of a simple list. Even setting aside whether 0.8% is "competitive" or whatever, people can certainly average more that that with Tangerine, albeit moving money back and forth. Leaving them off the list says "Tangerine is of no interest to people interested in the topic of this site (high interest savings)", and that just isn't true. Sacrificing information to some sort of purity test is more the function of an opinionated advisory site, not an informational one.

July 13, 2016
3:22 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9395
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Personally, I don't really care whether Tang etc are listed. I rarely use the comparison chart anyway.

However, any newbie who looks at the chart and sees such a low rate is not likely to pursue that institution at all. Everyone else knows to look on the Tang forum, or whichever bank it is, or at the Promos, to find out what the latest complicated scheme is.

If you're going to list Tang at 0.8, then I'd be hard-pressed to think of a reason why you shouldn't list Scotia, with its myriad accounts to sort through.

I think we all agree there should be some criteria, and that they should be enforced. The discussion is over what those criteria should be. Doing this does not make it an "opinionated advisory site".

July 13, 2016
6:43 pm
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4024
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Maybe the list can just be the "top 15" or something like that. And maybe there could be two lists, one for federally-covered banks, the other for provincially-covered credit unions. Doesn't matter to me, just throwing out some ideas.

No permission to create posts

Please write your comments in the forum.