5:40 pm
July 18, 2017
Norman1 said
The MomentumPLUS Savings account seems to be a complex product.
…
The idea of this is sound -- the longer you save, the more you get. It's basically (as mentioned elsewhere on this thread) a cashable GIC, but from the savings angle.
What Scotiabank is trying to do -- and they were transparent about it when the product was introduced -- is get people into the habit of saving for longer. It was an incentive to change behaviour.
I took advantage of the Momentum account when it was first introduced. Back then, the rates were very good. If memory serves, they were higher than other HISAs, as well as some 1-2 year GICs.
But since then, their rates have been medicore, and it has always been better (and far simpler) to go with a Simplii, Tang, EQ or Motive HISA.
5:44 pm
March 15, 2019
Norman1 said
I think the 0.97% comes from the 360 day period:
Regular
InterestBonus
InterestPremium Interest Ultimate
Package0.05% 1.20%
110 days0.15%
90 days0.25%
180 days0.35%
270 days0.45%
360 days0.10% 0.00%
250 daysFor the 360-day period, the 1.2% Bonus Interest for the first 110 days works out to be 0.37% over the whole 360-day period. The result is 0.97%:
0.05% + 0.37% + 0.45% + 0.10% = 0.97%
Good work. I think you are correct. When I spoke to the BNS rep I simply asked him what is the blended rate if I leave the funds in the account for 360 days. He got back to me the next day and said 0.97%.
6:29 pm
September 6, 2020
Norman1 said
The MomentumPLUS Savings account seems to be a complex product. …
cristunity said
The idea of this is sound -- the longer you save, the more you get. It's basically (as mentioned elsewhere on this thread) a cashable GIC, but from the savings angle.
I have ONE GIC that is a cashable 5 year interest compounded to maturity. If I want to cash SOME/ALL the rate drops to 1% for the withdrawn funds back to date of deposit. Not sure exactly how it works. If I withdraw $1,000 after 4 years does that mean I collect 1% interest or $10 for 4 years or does it mean I collect (1.01^4 -1) * $1,000 = $40.60 interest for 4 years. I am NOT cashing before maturity date.
Have a Great Day
7:51 pm
July 18, 2017
topgun said
I have ONE GIC that is a cashable 5 year interest compounded to maturity. If I want to cash SOME/ALL the rate drops to 1% for the withdrawn funds back to date of deposit. Not sure exactly how it works. If I withdraw $1,000 after 4 years does that mean I collect 1% interest or $10 for 4 years or does it mean I collect (1.01^4 -1) * $1,000 = $40.60 interest for 4 years. I am NOT cashing before maturity date.
There's also the fact that regardless of the math to determine how much you'd get, you would need to (and want to) file an adjustment with the CRA -- because some of the interest you had been reporting on your tax returns didn't actually materialize for you.
For example, you may have reported interest of $200 in year 1, $220 in year 2, and $240 in year 3. This is on the full investment. But then you cash out some of it, and that $200 in year 1 becomes something like $190 (or whatever). And the same for years 2 and 3. So you'd have to find a way to tell the CRA "The $200 interest I faithfully reported 3 years ago is actually $190, so give me back the taxes I paid on that $10 difference."
I don't think this would be a fun exercise.
8:03 pm
April 6, 2013
The situation was discussed in Tax treatment of GIC interest penalties.
There's no amendment of previous T5 slips or tax returns. One is deemed to have paid some of the interest back in the current tax year and deducts it in that tax year.
8:42 pm
September 6, 2020
cristunity said
There's also the fact that regardless of the math to determine how much you'd get, you would need to (and want to) file an adjustment with the CRA -- because some of the interest you had been reporting on your tax returns didn't actually materialize for you.
For example, you may have reported interest of $200 in year 1, $220 in year 2, and $240 in year 3. This is on the full investment. But then you cash out some of it, and that $200 in year 1 becomes something like $190 (or whatever). And the same for years 2 and 3. So you'd have to find a way to tell the CRA "The $200 interest I faithfully reported 3 years ago is actually $190, so give me back the taxes I paid on that $10 difference."
I don't think this would be a fun exercise.
I thought about what I would do if I had clawback of some of the interest I paid tax on as well. Not going to cash so I will not have a problem.
Have a Great Day
4:39 pm
October 21, 2013
COIN said
BNS made this product unnecessarily overly complicated. Not everyone of their clients had a PHD in math. LOL! Why would BNS do such a thing?
If you are a bank, acquiring clients who don't really know what they are doing is golden.
People like us, on the other hand, who read all the fine print and ask annoying questions, and who always have our bowls extended asking for 'more, please" are a pain in the rear!
7:40 pm
July 9, 2020
Norman1 said
I think the 0.97% comes from the 360 day period:
Regular
InterestBonus
InterestPremium Interest Ultimate
Package0.05% 1.20%
110 days0.15%
90 days0.25%
180 days0.35%
270 days0.45%
360 days0.10% 0.00%
250 daysFor the 360-day period, the 1.2% Bonus Interest for the first 110 days works out to be 0.37% over the whole 360-day period. The result is 0.97%:
0.05% + 0.37% + 0.45% + 0.10% = 0.97%
Norman1: Thank you so much for all that you do on this site. I agree with comments above this thread: almost requires a PhD (or Norman1) to translate.
And Loonie, I also appreciate your comments above.
I think of another thread on this site re seniors (sadly, also Scotiabank -- is there a trend here?!). Good golly -- if this BNS / Scotiabank jib-jab (aka: if-this-then-that) has all of us confuddled -- I can only extrapolate as to how confusing (outrageously so!) this 'promotion' is to the general public. Le sigh ...
10:11 am
July 18, 2017
Loonie said
If you are a bank, acquiring clients who don't really know what they are doing is golden.
People like us, on the other hand, who read all the fine print and ask annoying questions, and who always have our bowls extended asking for 'more, please" are a pain in the rear!
There are lots of people in Canada who still feel safer not just sticking with one of the Big 5, but with sticking to "their brand." So, if they have (or had) their mortgage and RRSPs with TD, they lean heavily in that direction for savings and investments.
For us in here, it's a different story -- opening HISAs and GICs and doing the CDIC/DICO/etc. tango is kind of recreational. Like, we kind of enjoy flowing our money into Canadian Tire (can't believe I just typed that) for a while, and then pushing it to EQ, or Motive, or whatever. Maybe as we get older it's less fun, but we still shop around are better for it.
But lots of people just don't do that. They certainly could. But they don't -- and the banks know this. It's less about financial management than it is about basic human behaviour...people stick with what they know.
I remember having a conversation with one of the guys who runs GIC Wealth Management, and he pointed all of this out. He said he regularly meets with clients -- usually older -- who have 6 and seven figures squirrelled away in a big 5 bank earning virtually nothing.
8:06 pm
April 14, 2021
cristunity said
For us in here, it's a different story -- opening HISAs and GICs and doing the CDIC/DICO/etc. tango is kind of recreational.
It may be easy and kind of recreational, but it comes with inherent risks. Every time an account is opened at a new institution, that institution makes a credit check for the new client. IIRC, a few years ago, there was a data breach affecting new client credit applications. (Capital One)
Every window into your home/personal information is another access point for potential illegal entry.
10:41 pm
September 29, 2017
The data breach was of Desjardins... nothing to do with affecting client credit;.
There was also a breach of Equifax ... so affecting credit data.
Only some banks do hard credit checks... most do soft credit checks. That said, none affect your vulnerability any more or less. These are all separate issues.
Of course having more accounts means more potential targets for your data. BUT what the banks hold is different than what the credit bureaus hold.
8:31 am
September 11, 2013
cristunity, exactly, it's about human behaviour, all successful businesses get that. Though there are a few extremists who spend lots of time worrying about every dollar of their money, the vast majority of people would rather spend their lives doing other stuff than spending their hours trying to save $20 here, $20 there. Especially if they're not poor, which most people aren't. Just the way it is, and that silent and vast majority is where the money is to be made.
9:27 am
July 18, 2017
Bill said
cristunity, exactly, it's about human behaviour, all successful businesses get that. Though there are a few extremists who spend lots of time worrying about every dollar of their money, the vast majority of people would rather spend their lives doing other stuff than spending their hours trying to save $20 here, $20 there. Especially if they're not poor, which most people aren't. Just the way it is, and that silent and vast majority is where the money is to be made.
Obsession with money becomes a habit. People believe that they can switch it off once they have enough. But that's the delusion: it is never enough. There is always going to be someone who has more. Comparison is the thief of joy.
10:00 am
September 7, 2018
Bill said
cristunity, exactly, it's about human behaviour, all successful businesses get that. Though there are a few extremists who spend lots of time worrying about every dollar of their money, the vast majority of people would rather spend their lives doing other stuff than spending their hours trying to save $20 here, $20 there. Especially if they're not poor, which most people aren't. Just the way it is, and that silent and vast majority is where the money is to be made.
cristunity said
Obsession with money becomes a habit. People believe that they can switch it off once they have enough. But that's the delusion: it is never enough. There is always going to be someone who has more. Comparison is the thief of joy.
Valid comments above. I am sometimes amazed when I read various posts on this blog. Some posters sound like they are going to have a coronary because they had to pay a $2 service charge (they think they should never have to pay a transfer fee or a service charge even when they were late paying a bill) - or that the transfer of funds from one FI to another took more than 1 day and they lost $1.50 in interest. Or they were not offered a good enough promo ("they are a dishonest FI"!). Or the posters who did not get their free "made in China" chocolates from FIs (always wanting something for nothing.) etc. I guess this is all part of the "obsession" quirk mentioned by Cristunity above. There truly is so much to enjoy in life other than obsessing constantly over every $1.
11:39 am
April 6, 2013
It isn't a competition. The obsession is not really an issue.
People can learn to be mindful of their own behaviour. One can change after one realises one has money to last to age 200 and that the longest living person (Jeanne Calment) lived to age 122. As well, one can always get rid of extra money easily.
Most people have a serious issue with the opposite: Mindless and careless spending. For example, those who are oblivious to those ATM convenience fees. There seems to be lots of money to be made from people oblivious to paying $10 to withdraw $100 of cash!
12:11 pm
September 11, 2013
It's not a serious issue if you blow $10 to withdraw $100 if your life is otherwise rich and fulfilling and you're not poor, some might say that's "winning". I get the impression that there are a very few people (out of all the millions of Canadians there are a very few regulars on here trying to save every penny) who've got nothing better to do (it's actually sad) than spend their time on their money every day. And many young people are cavalier with fees etc as they're too busy having fun, way better things to do (those days were awesome!) and when they settle down and life starts to get routine and more boring they then get interested in not throwing their money around so carelessly, it's a natural progression. But only a tiny fraction end up having nothing better to do than daily moving their money here and there to avoid a $2 fee, etc - and that's healthy for the banks, and very healthy for society.
12:54 pm
April 14, 2021
Those folks who are cavalier in their spending habits are likely the same ones to constantly lament about how they never seem to have any money to do X or Y things. Or, how home ownership is out of their grasp. I strongly suspect that the majority of current homeowners were not spending $10 for a daily cup of coffee, $15 food delivery charges, or $10 bank fees when they were scrimping and saving for a house down payment.
4:53 pm
November 18, 2017
Many of us are retired, semi-retired or at a point in life where we cannot expect to be able to increase our income. Avoiding getting "nicked and dimed" is the chief way we can maintain our financial stability. It makes sense.
Keep in mind that, because of taxation, a penny saved can often mean up to 1.5 pennies earned! (Sales taxes as well as income taxes.)
Waiting a day before purchasing things to "cool off" is helpful too. And avoiding pre-commited payments like subscription boxes and gym memberships we don't really want or need is important. Not to mention media services and overpriced internet and mobile plans.
I have an amplied digital antenna and a non-cable digital TV recorder. I get seven perfect TV channels and use the local library for programming, too. I'm fortunate to live where I have these opportunities, but plenty of people don't need full cable.
RetirEd
RetirEd
Please write your comments in the forum.