7:55 pm
April 17, 2024
Currently my mandatory RIF payment goes to towards my TFSA annual allotment. If I need more, I take more from my RRIF. For the mandatory amount, I take more from my RRIF for a 10% holdback and of course any extra under $5000 has a 10% hold back as well.
Since being involved in a large probate I find that the LAST owner or successor, upon death, can have a huge tax bill as all RRIF has to be dissolved and taxed. If the RRIF dissolution went to a trust vs the last personal income tax there could some very heavy taxation.
To date I have don’t need my RRIF $. But I can see in the next couple of years the need will come!
Should I worry about taxation after death?
Should I want to see that hard earned and self managed money to avoid a massive taxation if possible?
Does any one have a plan? All I can see to do I take RRIF to buy TFSA and then take xxxx.00 more per year and put it into a GIC and pay more tax on the interest.
Any one on a successful and logical plan? Would like to hear.
Thanks Barb.
9:07 pm
April 27, 2017
Multiple withdrawal strategies out there, take your pick: https://www.finiki.org/wiki/Withdrawal_strategies
I like the “guardrail” option.
Picking a tax efficient strategy is a really complex subject with a lot of moving parts. Using a fee for service advisor or Moneyreadyapp could be worth considering. You can also find some ideas here:
https://www.michaeljamesonmoney.com/2021/02/which-accounts-should-i-spend-from.html
http://pabroon.blogspot.com/20.....ng-20.html
Consider providing more info on your situation and asking the question in the Financial Wisdom Forum, which is more focused on issues beyond HISA and GICs.
11:41 pm
October 21, 2013
It's often a big shock to people when they realize what their RIF could cost in the long run. They never gave it much thought when making RSP contributions and taking the income deduction and resulting tax reduction. Nobody ever suggests this when you buy, and that's a mistake.
I have been doing these withdrawals for several years, and believe it's the best thing for our situation when all is said and done. There are pros and cons.
Honestly, it really does matter what your specific situation is. So it may be good for me but not for you etc.
As has been said, there are a lot of variables that enter into this decision. I have tried to explain it several times and I don't have the energy to go through it all again.
In asking this question on a forum, you are likely to get partial answers and personal anecdotes, which are inadequate and can be misleading.
Hire yourself a Certified Financial Planner or accountant with experience in Retirement Income Planning and get them to do the work for you.
A great deal depends on various aspects of your personal financial situation and your goals for that money other than tax avoidance.
Some things to consider:
Your age.
Your marital status.
Who will inherit what's left and how important is it to you to leave them the maximum?
Your marginal tax rate, and how far along you are in that bracket now.
Threshold for reduction of Age Amount" on tax return.
Life Expectancy.
Threshold for Old Age Security clawback, currently about 91,000. (Try to keep below that.)
Anticipated changes in future income and expenses, e.g. stop working, receive inheritance, no kids to help you in old age so must hire etc.
These are just basic starting questions which you should have answers to before you spend money on advice.
A good planner will ask you these and more, and will map out an income strategy for your remaining years which will be tax efficient.
One way or another, the RIF money is going to be taxed at your marginal rate. So it's a question of managing that rate, the clawbacks and possible disentitlements in order for you to get the best and most appropriate outcome.
It can be hard to find a competent person who will do this job. If you belong to a bricks and mortar credit union, I would ask there. One of the ones I belong to has a CFP on staff whom I can consult for free although he probably wouldn't do an entire plan. I don't find bankers very good at this, but it's up to you.
We met with a CFP about 15 years ago who was provided by employer, but we did not find him helpful as he was focused on investing and tried to tell us we would be in penury if we didn't invest in the stock market! This has proven completely untrue, and I am now 77. You need someone who understands Retirement Income Planning, even better if they understand Alternative GIC investing, which most don't seem to, although it's a simple concept.
We decided to work out our own plan based on OUR priorities, and it has more than met our expectations. We set our main priority as making sure we always had "enough" at every stage of retirement, taken in five year stages. That was a higher priority for us than annual income or taxes per se. Works well for us, we don't worry, and we always seem to have more than expected. My RIF will be completely empty this year; spouse's will take about 8 years (although may have to be extended as circumstances are likely to change). Plans can always be change, and should be revisited regularly.
I must add that taking some extra out of the RIF whenever you feel you need it is not a plan. You can get into a lot of trouble doing it this way. Read Frank Vettese's book on retirement planning for details.
5:08 am
October 21, 2018
This is a huge problem that people ignore at their peril. It doesn't help when commentators like Gordon Pape tell his readers to "never take more than the minimum from your RRIF because you will pay too much tax."
My plan is to have both our RRIFs expired when I hit 80 which will be
6 more yearly withdrawals. The wife will be 82. I changed my RRSP to a RRIF the year I hit 65, so I could make use of the pension income transfer to my wife who did not work outside the home and I started taking large payments that year. I then changed hers to a RRIF when she hit 70. I now take approximately 2.5 X the minimum from mine and about 3 X the minimum from hers each January. I lost all my OAS a few years ago, and I transfer the exact amount to her so that her income equals the OAS recovery tax threshold, which was $86,912 for 2023, and it will be $90,997 next year. That way she still gets the max OAS and the extra money in play doesn't affect my OAS because it's eliminated already.
In my opinion the banks are complicit in this situation because they want to keep your money, and the government loves that huge tax windfall at the higher rate when the final tax return of the surviving spouse is completed.
6:02 am
November 8, 2018
BarbM said
To date I have don’t need my RRIF $. But I can see in the next couple of years the need will come!
Should I worry about taxation after death?
Why should you? Whatever afterlife you'll have, the one thing you would not need to worry for sure there is money and taxes.
Those who will inherit your assets should worry about taxation on inheritance.
Does any one have a plan?
You can't have one long term plan. To put it in prospective, suppose you plan to live another 30 years. It is 2024, scroll 30 years back to 1994 and ask yourself which personal financial plans that have been made in 1994 did not require adjustments by 2024?
That means, whatever you decide, don't stick to it if you see circumstances changing, be flexible.
---------------------------
Speaking about myself.
I don't need funds from RRSP at present day.
My plan is to hold with RRSP/RRIF withdrawals till I am 71, when government mandates minimum RRIF withdrawal. Then, only take minimum.
If my situation changes and I need money before 71, over what interest income from my Savings and CPP+OAS could cover, I'll start taking from Savings and RRSP to cover the difference.
If I die before I deplete my funds in RRSP/RRIF/Savings, I don't care what happens with that money next.
It is a simple plan, I don't like complex scenario.
7:56 am
September 11, 2013
BarbM, you say "If the RRIF dissolution went to a trust.........there could some very heavy taxation." I've never heard of a trust being a beneficiary of a RRIF, can you elaborate on what you mean here?
You're going to get all sorts of advice, whoever you ask, lots of plans out there, but it's not possible to be too specific until one knows lots more about your financial situation, personal priorities, etc. But I do agree that other forums would be more targeted to your questions.
Also you wonder "should I worry.......should I want?" My view on that is you should not question you own priorities, they are as legitimate as the various priorities each of us has for our money, it's all just personal choice and inclination and ultimately we all have our own peculiarities. What is comfortable for one is not for another, trust your own inclinations and go from there, is what I'd say.
8:41 am
March 14, 2023
Alexandre said
I don't need funds from RRSP at present day.My plan is to hold with RRSP/RRIF withdrawals till I am 71, when government mandates minimum RRIF withdrawal. Then, only take minimum.
There are some tax advantages with taking some RRIF income before age 71 that may benefit you. The Pension Income Amount tax credit and Pension splitting. Not too complex. If you use tax software you should be able to calculate your potential benefits.
8:52 am
January 25, 2024
Loonie said
Hire yourself a Certified Financial Planner or accountant with experience in Retirement Income Planning and get them to do the work for you.
There are at least 2 Canadian guys on youtube giving frequent advises regarding RRSP/RIFF/etc.
Of course they mention they have their own Fin Plan companies and most likely would like you to hire them. Do you think those 2 are credible and legitimate? (one is bold or shaving his head the other combs hair back - for reference).
I find fin adv. working for banks trying to sell you bank's mutual funds or similar. Even though they do make a charts and plans and what not my opinion they want you to keep money in their institution as long as possible.
9:04 am
November 8, 2018
Wrayzor said
Alexandre said
I don't need funds from RRSP at present day.My plan is to hold with RRSP/RRIF withdrawals till I am 71, when government mandates minimum RRIF withdrawal. Then, only take minimum.
There are some tax advantages with taking some RRIF income before age 71 that may benefit you. The Pension Income Amount tax credit and Pension splitting. Not too complex. If you use tax software you should be able to calculate your potential benefits.
I do use tax software and this is good recommendation overall. Will see if that makes sense for me personally, when I am eligible to claim that tax credit. Pension Income Amount tax credit is quite a small amount, so I am not sure yet.
9:23 am
April 6, 2013
BarbM said
Currently my mandatory RIF payment goes to towards my TFSA annual allotment. If I need more, I take more from my RRIF. For the mandatory amount, I take more from my RRIF for a 10% holdback and of course any extra under $5000 has a 10% hold back as well.Since being involved in a large probate I find that the LAST owner or successor, upon death, can have a huge tax bill as all RRIF has to be dissolved and taxed. If the RRIF dissolution went to a trust vs the last personal income tax there could some very heavy taxation.
…
The tax withheld on RRIF withdrawals is credited towards income taxes owed. If taxes actually owed turns out to be less, then one will receive the extra back later.
There is no choice when a RRIF collapsed on death. The value of the RRIF at death is income for the deceased on his/her final tax return and not income for the estate, even when the RRIF is collapsed to the estate.
The net RRSP/RRIF taxes on death are not as high as the taxes appear initially. A portion of the RRSP/RRIF is the tax refunds from the RRSP contributions deducted along with the growth of the tax refunds in the RRSP/RRIF. That portion needs to be subtracted from the taxes paid on the withdrawals to obtain the net taxes on the RRSP/RRIF.
We've shown in previous discussions that an RRSP/RRIF is equivalent to a TFSA when the average tax rate on the withdrawals, include that big one at the end, is the same as the average tax rate that the contributions were deducted at.
11:10 am
March 30, 2017
11:21 am
October 27, 2013
savemoresaveoften said
If income before RRSP / RRIF withdrawal is already at 40%+ marginal bracket, which already trigger 100% OAS clawback and such, is there still any minimize tax preferred strategies for withdrawal ?
I don't think so. It then comes down to strictly a deferred tax PV calculation BUT is still subject to significant variables such as portfolio returns over time (and by year), changes in tax rates over time and DOD, none of which we know. In my not so humble opinion, a crap shoot with no real answer and a total waste of time thinking about it. I take my RRIF annual minimum and the future will be whatever it will be.
Again, I will re-emphasize that RRIF withdrawal tax is simply a repayment of the tax loan provided by the taxpayer during the years of RRSP contributions and tax deductions. Why fret over something for which most of us have benefited from tax deferral over all those years?
5:29 pm
October 21, 2013
savemoresaveoften said
If income before RRSP / RRIF withdrawal is already at 40%+ marginal bracket, which already trigger 100% OAS clawback and such, is there still any minimize tax preferred strategies for withdrawal ?
Not that I can think of.
The only other option I can think of that might benefit you is if you buy a life annuity with the RIF funds and live to be very very old. The annuity will pay longer than the RIF will at mandatory amounts as the latter leads to a natural depletion in your 90s. But you are gambling on longevity and estate would lose if you die younger. This MAY mean you get more net out of the RIF in the end but I have not done that calculation so I don't know if it's beneficial.
In your situation, it is perhaps best to just take mandatory amount unless you have a spending plan that requires more money.
5:34 pm
November 15, 2018
Slightly off topic but here's my story on my RIF. I read in a financial forum that the first $2,000 withdrawn from a RIF is tax free. With that knowledge I did a direct transfer of $12,000 from my RSP to a RIF. Both accounts were with TD Waterhouse. I then withdrew $2,000 last year from my RIF only to find out this $2,000 tax credit only applies if I am receiving OAS which I'm not. With this new knowledge & since I do not need the money atm (money within RIF's have a minimum withdrawal per year) I did a direct transfer of the balance ($10,000) of my RIF back to my RSP. Again I thought wrongly that as long as it was a direct transfer between the 2 registered accounts there would be no tax implications. Because I had previously maxed my RSP contribution room I am now $10,000 over contributed in my RSP & the penalty for over contributions in an RSP is I believe 1% per month. In order to stop the 1% per month penalty & will have to withdraw the $10,000 which of course will be taxed. Live & learn.
5:40 pm
October 27, 2013
5:47 pm
October 21, 2013
AltaRed said
I don't think so. It then comes down to strictly a deferred tax PV calculation BUT is still subject to significant variables such as portfolio returns over time (and by year), changes in tax rates over time and DOD, none of which we know. In my not so humble opinion, a crap shoot with no real answer and a total waste of time thinking about it. I take my RRIF annual minimum and the future will be whatever it will be.
Again, I will re-emphasize that RRIF withdrawal tax is simply a repayment of the tax loan provided by the taxpayer during the years of RRSP contributions and tax deductions. Why fret over something for which most of us have benefited from tax deferral over all those years?
The person who dies with large RIF is not going to fret. It's the beneficiaries who fret because their piece of the pie has dramatically decreased. If the deceased had realized the consequences, they might have planned differently - or not.
6:01 pm
April 17, 2024
dommm said
Slightly off topic but here's my story on my RIF. I read in a financial forum that the first $2,000 withdrawn from a RIF is tax free. With that knowledge I did a direct transfer of $12,000 from my RSP to a RIF. Both accounts were with TD Waterhouse. I then withdrew $2,000 last year from my RIF only to find out this $2,000 tax credit only applies if I am receiving OAS which I'm not. With this new knowledge & since I do not need the money atm (money within RIF's have a minimum withdrawal per year) I did a direct transfer of the balance ($10,000) of my RIF back to my RSP. Again I thought wrongly that as long as it was a direct transfer between the 2 registered accounts there would be no tax implications. Because I had previously maxed my RSP contribution room I am now $10,000 over contributed in my RSP & the penalty for over contributions in an RSP is I believe 1% per month. In order to stop the 1% per month penalty & will have to withdraw the $10,000 which of course will be taxed. Live & learn.
Not really off topic. Is good information.
Read this. https://ca.rbcwealthmanagement.com/documents/165983/166003/Pension+Tax+Credit.pdf
Before next move contact a professional or post here. Since RRSP and RRIF is taxable the only difference is that a RIF requires you must take a mandatory amount and there is no tax withhold BUT it is taxable. I believe I started RRSP withdrawals in my early 60’s. My withdrawals were always in my same tax bracket. No, it’s not spent….its all in TFSA and remains untouched.
Keep in mind a tax credit is not a big deal. Ie. Say you have $5000 in medical claims. Then “say” only $3000 is allowed based on your income. Then the $3000 has the lowest tax bracket (of course) applied against it. Ie. 3000 * 15% gets you $450 off your taxes….not $3000.
If you had left the RRSP in the RRIF. Be it $2000 or $10000 here is the mandatory withdrawal chart.
https://www.woodgundy.cibc.com/en/reference/retirement-planning/rrif-minimum-withdrawal.html
You can still put the withdrawn RRSP or RRIF into a TFSA. While some don’t worry about downsizing their RRIF or RRSP there are some benefits to minimize your taxable income for a few debatable reasons.
1. Lower income has helped me qualify for an income tested federal dental program.
2. That worry of dying with a sack of gold in RRIFs and the full amount gets taxed, most likely at one of the two highest tax rates. That is if you are last to die.
To wind down RRIFs you must have disciplines. Ie when needed don’t take more from TFSA than the % and age limit of a RRIF withdrawal.
6:07 pm
April 17, 2024
Avoiding the OAS clawback is an excellent point that I would not likely have thought of.
Thank you.
Although I am aware of it.
That piece needs to be worked out on tax software by copying your current tax file to a “test” file and add in more RRIF $, do the optimizations and review taxation amount and rate and that you have avoided a clawback.
4:46 am
March 30, 2017
Loonie said
Not that I can think of.
The only other option I can think of that might benefit you is if you buy a life annuity with the RIF funds and live to be very very old. The annuity will pay longer than the RIF will at mandatory amounts as the latter leads to a natural depletion in your 90s. But you are gambling on longevity and estate would lose if you die younger. This MAY mean you get more net out of the RIF in the end but I have not done that calculation so I don't know if it's beneficial.In your situation, it is perhaps best to just take mandatory amount unless you have a spending plan that requires more money.
Yeah thought of annuity too but the income from annuity is also taxable, so like you said, it’s a pure gamble on longevity. Annuity does bring insurance against outlive the money or lose money management mental ability at some point.
Re people convert RRSP into RRIF before 71, I don’t see real benefit from a tax perspective. Both withdrawal are taxable anyway, and one can replicate the withdrawal 100% in either.
5:00 am
October 21, 2018
Re people convert RRSP into RRIF before 71, I don’t see real benefit from a tax perspective. Both withdrawal are taxable anyway, and one can replicate the withdrawal 100% in either.
There are reasons to do so. In my case my wife did not work outside the home so the best scenario for me was to always get as much income as possible on her tax return. The year that I hit 65, I converted my RRSP to a RRIF and began aggressive withdrawals so as to make use of pension income splitting. I was already able to do that with my company pension, but the RRIF income also qualifies as pension income. Not so with an RRSP withdrawal. You must be 65 and it must be a RRIF to use the T1032 pension transfer form.
Please write your comments in the forum.