7:56 pm
October 27, 2013
11:08 pm
December 12, 2009
Bill said
Doug, you don't have to pay anyone to file your return, here's a link to CRA site that lists the authorized free (and pay) software:
I know, but that still requires using software. The OP, or another poster, and I pointed out the advantages of TELEFILE: it was free and required no additional software. For instance, someone could even prepare their tax return using the paper forms, and file it via TELEFILE rather than mailing it in, keeping a copy and all supporting documentation if asked. It's wrong to eliminate it and replace with this very poor substitute to a very limited clientele that sees them prepare their return for them. The people who are targeted are already eligible for free tax return preparation through the Community Volunteer Income Tax Program. 🙂
To quote a fine Alaskan governor and mom, who reportedly can see Russia from her house (or was that an SNL-only fake quotation? I can never remember!), it's like "putting lipstick on a pig." 😉
Cheers,
Doug
11:11 pm
December 12, 2009
9:33 am
September 11, 2013
I guess the advantage of this new, limited initiative (maybe a test for possible future expansion) vs TELEFILE is you don't have to actually file your complete return data over the phone, you just have to answer a few questions and they'll do your return for you with the information they already have.
At this point it's a limited initiative aimed at maybe a million folks to make it a bit easier for them to file. The Minister referred to "people with reduced mobility, people who live far from service locations and people without Internet access" and I guess the implication is that low or fixed income folks might more frequently fall into those categories. (I notice you qualify by having low or fixed income so I guess it could apply to higher earners too - not sure what a "fixed" income means to CRA, though they indicate it's if your income "is unchanged year-to-year" but I don't think that would apply to anyone - does anyone have exactly the same income year after year?)
Winnie, I don't know why you didn't get an invite, sounds like you qualify, but I also didn't get a paper return as they said they were doing this year for those that filed on paper previously. But it's normal for new initiatives to have some bugs the first while.
10:07 am
December 12, 2009
AltaRed said
Maybe just get back on topic regarding CRA criteria (or lack thereof) on who it is inviting to participate.
I would argue we've not strayed from the topic. The OP posted about "File My Return," a new CRA tax filing service for ultra low income taxpayers, and we've just talked about that, CVITP, TELEFILE, and NETFILE, all related tax filing services. 🙂
Off-topic is like, when we stray from the topic of Coast Capital Savings' 4.00% 33-month convertible GICs to Liberal versus Conservative economic and fiscal policies or something like that. 😉
Cheers,
Doug
10:12 am
December 12, 2009
Bill said
I guess the advantage of this new, limited initiative (maybe a test for possible future expansion) vs TELEFILE is you don't have to actually file your complete return data over the phone, you just have to answer a few questions and they'll do your return for you with the information they already have.At this point it's a limited initiative aimed at maybe a million folks to make it a bit easier for them to file. The Minister referred to "people with reduced mobility, people who live far from service locations and people without Internet access" and I guess the implication is that low or fixed income folks might more frequently fall into those categories. (I notice you qualify by having low or fixed income so I guess it could apply to higher earners too - not sure what a "fixed" income means to CRA, though they indicate it's if your income "is unchanged year-to-year" but I don't think that would apply to anyone - does anyone have exactly the same income year after year?)
Winnie, I don't know why you didn't get an invite, sounds like you qualify, but I also didn't get a paper return as they said they were doing this year for those that filed on paper previously. But it's normal for new initiatives to have some bugs the first while.
A million? I think it's even more limited than that. We're talking seniors that receive only a single OAS payment, maybe $50-150 per month CPP (if that), Spouses Allowance, and GIS. Probably a few hundred thousand, at best. It sounds like it might even be further targeted within that population, or to low income non-retired tax filers, that used TELEFILE, not those that went to a tax prep service or used NETFILE. It could be as little as 50,000.
I still don't see the point in scrapping TELEFILE and calling this a "win" One does not have to replace the other.
Cheers,
Doug
10:46 am
September 11, 2013
Doug, you may be right that it's between 50,000 and a few hundred thousand.
But here's what CBC says:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politic.....-1.4477378
But here's what the Minister of Revenue says:
https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/news/2018/01/minister_lebouthillierannouncesimprovementstotaxfilingservicesfo0.html
You are however correct in saying the former TELEFILE and this initiative are mutually exclusive, they are unrelated.
12:15 pm
December 17, 2016
From the CBC link above
"About two million Canadians filed their tax returns on paper last year, compared to four million in 2012."
I download the T1 General forms from the CRA website, used Adobe to complete the forms, printed them off, and mailed them in. I mailed in my completed return about 2 weeks before I received the CRA package in my mailbox - in my case, it was a waste of paper and postage on the CRA's part, to aend me the package.
12:30 pm
September 11, 2013
Top It Up, I used to do that but every April I assist about a dozen family members when they do their paper return at my dining room table and darned if I'm paying for all that ink. This year I went online in February and ordered 8 T1 Return packages, got 2. So I went up the block to the post office outlet and got the rest that I needed.
2:18 pm
December 12, 2009
Bill said
Doug, you may be right that it's between 50,000 and a few hundred thousand.But here's what CBC says:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politic.....-1.4477378But here's what the Minister of Revenue says:
https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/news/2018/01/minister_lebouthillierannouncesimprovementstotaxfilingservicesfo0.htmlYou are however correct in saying the former TELEFILE and this initiative are mutually exclusive, they are unrelated.
Thanks Bill.
Ah, I was just going on what someone else said in this thread that it was related to TELEFILE being scrapped so I was just arguing that they should be treated exclusively. It seems that they were, and that it was the Conservatives that scrapped TELEFILE. Note the CRA's media handler, John Power's "spin", saying, "... the Telefile service had required users to complete their income tax and benefit return before calling, which meant they had to do their own calculations beforehand." Of course they did! That was its purpose. It wasn't meant to be a telephone equivalent of NETFILE, though that was possible; the "beauty" (if there is such as thing in income tax preparation! ) was that it meant those that filled their forms out by hand could save on printing and postage costs by "returning" the needed "line item" data to the CRA. 🙁
It's too bad.
Personally, perhaps we should just cut the tax rate to, say, 15-25% (three brackets: 15-, 20, and 25-), eliminate all non-refundable tax credits and deductions (including RRSP deduction, but raise the TFSA limit; excluding accrued capital losses), raise the basic personal exemption (federal and provincial) to around $20-24,000 per person so that low income earners pay no income tax, and have the CRA compile our tax returns for us (like Norway does). There'd be much less legal tax evasion loopholes, other than foreign assets held in non-participatory tax sharing jurisdictions.
Earnings within each of the three simplified tax brackets would be taxed as follows on the portion of earnings within that bracket:
$0-24,000 - 0% tax rate
$24,001-50,000 - 15% tax rate
$50,001-75,000 - 20% tax rate
$75,001- and higher - 25% tax rate
For businesses, eliminate all of those non-refundable tax credits (other than accrued capital losses and maybe investments in plant & equipment) as well as simplify things as follows, like personal taxpayers:
Small businesses - sliding scale
$0-250,000-10% tax rate
$250,001-350,000-11% tax rate
$350,001-500,000-12% tax rate
$500,001-625,000-13% tax rate
$625,001-750,000-14% tax rate
Medium- and large businesses
$750,001 and up-15% tax rate
Note: the above would be federal tax rates only.
Cheers,
Doug
4:25 am
February 27, 2018
Kidd said
Federal, Provincial and Municipal. I have 50 people working me... and not a one ever hears a word i say. Every hick town in canada needs a mayor and a handful of councilors. Canada is worse off than Greece.New York. Population 8.55 million. 51 councilors
Toronto Ontario. Population 2.8 million. 47 councilorshttp://worldpopulationreview.c.....opulation/
https://council.nyc.gov/districts/
I had to go digging for this thread. I think... Dougie might be a fan of this web site. "Toronto City councillors to be cut in half". I hope we keep the bottom half because that's where their brains are.
Please write your comments in the forum.