6:24 am
Thanks for the background on Sunova. Efficiency Ratios essentially tell the story of how well managed a bank or financial institution is being managed and are easily calculated based on the non-interest expenses being divided by total revenues. Sunova is over 80% for the past number of years. Remember, the lower the ratio the better over the long-term. 50% to 60% is ideal.
8:39 am
August 4, 2010
I think you'll find the efficiency number is non-interest expenses divided by (total revenue minus interest expenses). On that basis, Sunova was around 71% and 74% for 2009 and 2010 - about or a bit better than average for Canadian credit unions (75%), a bit worse than the Manitoba average (69%), and nowhere near as good as the best of them (Cambrian and Crosstown are around the 50% mark).
Sunova looks rather worse in 2011 (88%), but that's almost certainly a direct result of the three new branches - their occupancy and salary costs have gone up, but the new branches wouldn't be bringing in as much revenue yet as established ones. It is an investment, not a sign of deterioration as such.
I doubt any of this has much to do with the Hubert rates. If they have, say, $50 million in Hubert HISAs, that's only something like $6000/month for the extra 15 basis points between 1.85% and 2%. Unless the other Manitoba CUs are planning to follow down, I suspect Sunova is just jacking the rates around now that they've got what they consider a sufficient customer base from the original teaser rates.
Please write your comments in the forum.