11:48 am
October 27, 2013
That last point in the Scotia RRIF Terms and Conditions is what I have read elsewhere in discussion forums. The question raised in post #12 still stands. From what I have read, at least some FIs would have prevented the situation from happening in the first place.
Example: A 70 year old has a maturing GIC in his RRSP. The FI won't allow a full renewal for a non-redeemable non-transferable GIC for 5 years if the RRSP does not contain other assets that could be liquidated in years 2, 3 and 4 to meet the mandatory minimum annual withdrawals needed in the RRIF when the annuitant is 72, 73 and 74 years old. I recall a thread, if not here, elsewhere where someone ran across that problem and didn't understand why that was the case. One can understand an FI potentially being smart enough to see that coming....while others may not do so and then a problem occurs in 2 years.
An individual with a fairly balanced 5 year GIC ladder of 5 or 10 GICs in a RRIF would not run into that issue because of maturing investments each year. This type of potential issue is a reason I, at age 73, am now collapsing my 5 year bond/GIC ladder in my RRIF into a single ETF. I don't want to 'forget' to renew properly or have my POA forget to manage this properly, or even burden a POA with this oversight and management. Much easier for an FI to sell units of an ETF to meet annual withdrawal requirements. One of the points made in post #9.
12:18 pm
September 11, 2013
That's why if you have several RRIFs the minimum has to come out of each, because it's that FI's responsibility to make sure.
Whether or not an FI makes sure you have enough liquid in this or future years probably varies, depending on how much resources each wants to put into "parenting". Because at the end of the day there's a market for everything, even a GIC can be sold if the discount is deep enough, so liquidity can always be achieved if necessary.
CRA T4040 Guide re RRIFs, etc contains no reference to not taking out at least the minimum, appears CRA is treating it like it can't occur.
8:16 am
May 26, 2022
Brokerage GIC rates are typically significantly lower than the best bank/trust company/credit union rates.
However the Laurentian Bank & B2B Bank 2 year GIC rate is 4.95% with TD brokerage today. This rate is higher than the GIC rates comparison chart as well as what Laurentian & B2B are offering on their websites.
8:53 am
April 6, 2013
Scotia iTRADE has two-year GIC's from General Bank of Canada for 4.99%.
Next best is 4.95% from B2B Bank and the Scotiabank related issuers (Bank of Nova Scotia, Scotia Mortgage Corp., ADS Canadian Bank, Montreal Trust, and National Trust).
BMO InvestorLine has two-year 4.95% GIC's from Laurentian Bank and BMOIL's related issuers Bank of Montreal, Bank of Montreal Mortgage Corp., and BMO Trust.
8:35 am
December 12, 2021
6:22 am
April 6, 2013
4:28 pm
January 17, 2021
5:57 pm
September 11, 2013
6:43 pm
January 12, 2019
5:36 am
January 17, 2021
6:58 am
April 6, 2013
With TD Direct Investing and Scotia iTRADE, the investment dealer holds the GIC's in the brokerage account. The GIC's are not registered in the client's name as they would be with one of the smaller deposit brokers.
Usually, joint broker accounts are supported. Page 7 of the Scotia iTRADE personal account application shows the different brokerage account types they support. The types include joint accounts as well as tenants-in-common accounts.
8:36 am
January 17, 2021
Thanks Norman1 for your comments.
If I opened up a TD Direct Investing or a Scotia iTRADE account for the sole purpose of investing in gic's jointly, what would be the cost if any to do this. Would each individual have to open an account and then purchase gic's jointly., or is only one joint account opened.
Thanks
9:10 am
April 6, 2013
With GIC's, the commission is already included in the GIC yield quoted at Scotia iTRADE and presumably also at TD Direct Investing. However, the discount brokers are not interested in small accounts with not much trading commissions.
Scotia iTRADE will charge administration fees for such accounts. Not a problem if one wishes to buy $50,000 of GIC's. But, for total accounts under $10,000, there could be a $25/quarter admin fee at Scotia iTRADE:
2The Low Activity Account Administration Fee (“LAAA Fee”) is charged on a per account basis each calendar quarter. This fee will be assessed based on the client’s account balances, trading activity and age at the close of business on each of March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15 of each year. The LAAA Fee will be waived;
i) for new clients who have opened their first account at Scotia iTRADE within the 6 preceding months,
ii) for client accounts where at least 1 commission-generating trade was executed in any one or more of client’s Scotia iTRADE accounts during the preceding 3 months,
iii) for Registered Plan accounts (RRSP, RIF, LIRA, LIF, RESP, TFSA),
iv) for Cash Optimizer Investment Accounts,
v) for clients with total account equity at Scotia iTRADE greater than $10,000,
vi) for accounts of clients who have achieved the age of majority but are under 26 years of age at any point during the year for which LAAA Fees are assessed and
vii) for Unclaimed Accounts,
provided that in each of (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v) and (vi), all accounts of the client are fully activated and the client has a valid and current mailing address on file with Scotia iTRADE.
With respect to (vi), if applicable, the LAAA Fees will be charged for the year subsequent to the year during which the client turns 26 years of age. Commission-generating trades are buys and sells of: Equities, Options, Mutual Funds subject to commissions, and Fixed Income instruments. Buys and Sells of GICs, ETFs which do not generate a commission, Canada Savings Bonds and Provincial Savings Bonds, are examples of trades that do not generate commissions.
TD Direct Investing will charge $25/quarter maintenance when accounts in household total under $15,000.
Only one joint brokerage account would be needed if one wishes to hold the GIC's jointly. Separate individual brokerage accounts would end up holding the GIC's separately.
9:51 am
September 11, 2013
Norman1, you say the investment dealer holds the GICs, not registered in client's (two in the case of a joint account) name. Then your last post says you'd need a joint account to hold GICs jointly. These seem contradictory to me, can you elaborate?
(I've also got joint accounts with discount brokers such as TD DI, I'd always assumed any GICs I might purchase would be held jointly, i.e. I never they would not be registered in our (joint owners') names until your recent info about held in nominee name, counted separately for CDIC purposes, etc.)
9:54 am
January 17, 2021
11:01 am
April 6, 2013
TD Direct Investing doesn't issue the GIC's it sells. It's just a dealer.
Deposit insurance coverage will depend on the issuer of the GIC. When one buys a TD Bank GIC through TD Direct Investing, the GIC is issued by TD Bank and not TD Direct Investing.
As a GIC issued by TD Bank, it would be covered by TD Bank's CDIC coverage.
11:08 am
April 6, 2013
Bill said
Norman1, you say the investment dealer holds the GICs, not registered in client's (two in the case of a joint account) name. Then your last post says you'd need a joint account to hold GICs jointly. These seem contradictory to me, can you elaborate?
…
One needs to have joint brokerage account with the investment dealer so that it is recorded to whom the investment dealer owes the GIC's in the account.
In nominee placement, the GIC is registered to a nominee, in trust. The nominee then owes the GIC to the brokerage account owner.
If the brokerage account is an individual account for Alice, then the nominee owes the GIC to Alice only.
If the intent is for the nominee to owe the GIC to joint tenants, Alice and Bob, then the brokerage account must be a joint tenant account for Alice and Bob.
Please write your comments in the forum.