7:33 pm
October 29, 2017
11:08 pm
April 14, 2021
5:11 am
April 27, 2017
It depends. If you are mainly buying Netflix, Google and Facebook then their productivity can increase to meet demand. No price hikes.
If you are buying healthcare then the prices are fixed. Inflation is showing as waiting times and cancelled operations. Nothing in the CPI.
If you are buying things which require inputs of materials or labour then you are facing significant inflation as well as shortages. Prices of inputs jumped. A lot. Its not reflected in CPI yet.
If you are buying assets then you are facing a massive inflation. Thats where people pumped all the printed money into. Desirable assets.
CPI shows only a small portion of the overall inflation picture. With a lag.
5:27 am
September 11, 2013
I find it hard to believe CERB, etc money was spent on stocks or other inflated assets, I think it was more the lack of spending on trips, entertainment venues, etc that found its way into assets. Some people saved a whack of money forgoing trips, etc.
Talked to a long-time contractor the other day, he said he can't get workers unless he pays them cash because they all want to stay on the gov't virus money too. Around here, anyway.
5:52 am
March 30, 2017
8:36 am
October 29, 2017
11:24 am
April 6, 2013
HermanH said
Because they give the appearance of dire circumstance. Scaremongering attracts eyeballs and sells advertising space.
Vatox said
In that case, I think that red line of month-on-month would have done a better job to scare people! 6% would be more effective at scaremongering.
It would be. But, it was some work to surface that 6% per annum price climb. Statistics Canada didn't point that out in their CPI releases.
Someone needed to download the CPI values for the 18 months, graph them, and do some analysis. I'm sure the economists and Bank of Canada policy people did that and are aware of that 6% price climb. But, I don't think any of the journalists did.
12:27 pm
October 29, 2017
Norman1 said
Vatox said
In that case, I think that red line of month-on-month would have done a better job to scare people! 6% would be more effective at scaremongering.
It would be. But, it was some work to surface that 6% per annum price climb. Statistics Canada didn't point that out in their CPI releases.
Someone needed to download the CPI values for the 18 months, graph them, and do some analysis. I'm sure the economists and Bank of Canada policy people did that and are aware of that 6% price climb. But, I don't think any of the journalists did.
Then the BoC is in serious neglect of its mandate to control inflation. There was 8 consecutive months on the 6% trajectory! But they don’t look at such short spans for policy making, and that’s the point! That eight months of 6% trajectory can easily vanish if next year values aren’t on the same trajectory. The future isn’t written yet and looking at month-on-month is too short. I actually believe December May come in at 6% because the supply chain is worsening and Christmas shopping is forecast to be bigger spending. A rate hike should help, but perhaps not enough. We will see how it all plays out.
1:04 pm
October 29, 2017
8:46 pm
April 27, 2017
savemoresaveoften said
Bill said
I find it hard to believe CERB, etc money was spent on stocksA lot of the younger generation that rec CERB puts it into meme stocks for quick capital appreciation the mindset. Platform likes robinhood and the like makes it easy to trade odd lots as small as 1 share.
The bank “printed” money via QE. QE artificially raised the cost of bonds and made borrowing cheap while making saving pointless. That forced money into desirable assets, like houses stocks, bitcoin, etc.
5:03 am
January 9, 2011
Article this morning that is right on;
A key paragraph from this, that likely will cause most or everyone here to say "I can relate to that" -
" But while the Macklem expects people with pandemic savings will only spend 20 per cent of that cash on goods, others, including the boss of RBC, David McKay, have predicted consumers will go on a major spending spree, driving inflation to new heights. It's possible that rising inflation would actually encourage spending as people watch the value of their savings shrink. "
CPI, especially as its structured with its components, is just diversionary rear view mirror thinking, promoting lack of timely or effective action, IMO.
"Keep your stick on the ice. Remember, I'm pulling for you. We're all in this together." - Red Green
5:57 am
March 30, 2017
dougjp said
Article this morning that is right on;A key paragraph from this, that likely will cause most or everyone here to say "I can relate to that" -
" But while the Macklem expects people with pandemic savings will only spend 20 per cent of that cash on goods, others, including the boss of RBC, David McKay, have predicted consumers will go on a major spending spree, driving inflation to new heights. It's possible that rising inflation would actually encourage spending as people watch the value of their savings shrink. "CPI, especially as its structured with its components, is just diversionary rear view mirror thinking, promoting lack of timely or effective action, IMO.
I think this time around, its not just spending spree that drives inflation. But rather the much longer than expected global disruption of shipments plus every business try to recoup their pandemic losses quickly via raising prices that drives it. With container shipping cost up 4x, all food and non-food prices are going up, no matter what one's buying habit is.
9:04 am
October 29, 2017
savemoresaveoften said
I think this time around, its not just spending spree that drives inflation. But rather the much longer than expected global disruption of shipments plus every business try to recoup their pandemic losses quickly via raising prices that drives it. With container shipping cost up 4x, all food and non-food prices are going up, no matter what one's buying habit is.
For sure, and Christmas spending has been polled at higher values too. With a rate hold it means we will get the highest inflation of the possibilities for the situation.
12:08 pm
November 18, 2017
The Bank of Canada rate has not changed, but the BoC HAS signaled it expects rates to rise sooner than had been expected until the Oct. 27th announcment. They hint at perhaps one or two .25% increases in mid-2022. That MAY nudge mid-to-long-term rates a touch higher: I'm holding on to my just-maturing GIC payout for at least a week to see if GIC rates move up a bit. In this situation, I wouldn't expect rates to move lower as a whole any time soon. (Any sort of major events might change this, of course.)
StatsCan figures indicate there IS a massive cash hoard unspent. Lots of government money went to people who were not yet on the edge, and not commuting to work, not eating out, not having entertainment events to go to and not having to dress and shave for work (etc.) cut expenses. Have you noticed the incredible push in financial-services investment advertising lately? People doing well are banking lots of cash; people working front-line or bottom-rung jobs are doing poorly. That's a big part of why so many are taking advantage of subsidies to quit crappy, low-paid, no-future marginal jobs and either retrain or simply spend more time looking for better opportunities.
And of course foreign workers are inhibited from coming to work by the pandemic. This will push up wages, which is a good thing in terms of income inequality.
Property prices continue to be pushed upward by policy choices favoring home investment. We could all (save the speculators) benefit by reduced, stable home prices. The housing market currently provides outsized returns that depress business investment AND tie up money that could be used for consumer spending.
RetirEd
RetirEd
1:34 pm
October 29, 2017
2:41 pm
April 6, 2013
Not necessarily. People don't just blindly pay whatever is being asked.
Just ask the lumber industry what happened to lumber prices this past year.
If retailers jack up their prices of Christmas ornaments by 3X, they may find they still have most of their inventory on December 24. Demand for Christmas ornaments and their price usually craters after December 25!
4:45 pm
October 29, 2017
7:20 pm
April 27, 2017
Norman1 said
Not necessarily. People don't just blindly pay whatever is being asked.Just ask the lumber industry what happened to lumber prices this past year.
If retailers jack up their prices of Christmas ornaments by 3X, they may find they still have most of their inventory on December 24. Demand for Christmas ornaments and their price usually craters after December 25!
This has been the case for several years. Retailers couldn’t raise prices because consumers refused to purchase their products. That inhibition has been broken and will impact behaviours for a while now.
Lumber prices are still high for consumers.
10:26 pm
April 14, 2021
mordko said
This has been the case for several years. Retailers couldn’t raise prices because consumers refused to purchase their products. That inhibition has been broken and will impact behaviours for a while now.
Even if costs have not risen for all companies, they are going to increase prices now, because the market has told them that they are willing to accept the 'inevitable' higher prices. Any business not raising prices is just foolish and missing out on an opportunity.
4:26 am
April 27, 2017
HermanH said
mordko said
This has been the case for several years. Retailers couldn’t raise prices because consumers refused to purchase their products. That inhibition has been broken and will impact behaviours for a while now.
Even if costs have not risen for all companies, they are going to increase prices now, because the market has told them that they are willing to accept the 'inevitable' higher prices. Any business not raising prices is just foolish and missing out on an opportunity.
Yep. And salaries are rising at a brisk pace. Thats going to push RPI up for quite some time. The Banks are going to regret they ever used the word “transitory”.
Please write your comments in the forum.