Oaken = Home Capital Group - risky business? | Page 2 | General financial discussion | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Oaken = Home Capital Group - risky business?
September 10, 2016
4:36 pm
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3111
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The big banks know they ae not competitive with the online banks so why bother? They get the older demographic or those not willing to go online themselves. I have 2 sons who work in the big 5. Its not us that they are after for deposit accounts.

September 11, 2016
5:42 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4013
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Exactly, AltaRed. Anyone who's had a thriving business knows there are some customers or groups of customers who you're not really interested in keeping so you do what you can to dissuade their business in order to free up time that can be spent more profitably.

September 11, 2016
8:35 am
kanaka
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1232
Member Since:
December 23, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Would it be........the big banks have an abundance of management and workers that they, for some reason, don't want to lay off and continue to survive by charging outrageous fees and offer low investment rates.

September 11, 2016
9:40 am
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3111
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I wouldn't be so critical of the big banks. They have been downsizing staff for a long time and will continue to do so to compete with Fintech. They will continue to scramble to ensure they get a good piece of that business. Costs are being scrubbed out of the system on a quarterly basis.

What they don't need to do is to increase interest rates on their deposits because they have a sizeable demographic that still believes in brick and mortar banks. It is only when they (and any deposit institution for that matter) need more deposits that they provide more attractive rates. Indeed, I believe each of the big banks do have a type of savings account that pays more for 'longer term' deposits. BMO has a Savings Builder account that will pay 1.25% for example (I use it), and I believe Scotia has a Momentum savings account that pays more too.

Also, many bank services that charge so-called outrageous fees are only available at brick and mortar banks. They have to keep staff employed and floor space open just for those things. Why should they not make it a profit centre? I also hope they start charging soon for utility payments, etc. Why should the bank shareholder (e.g. myself) pay for that service? If a customer doesn't like it, then pay the bills elsewhere. Try to do that at Zag or Oaken or EQ for example.

September 11, 2016
11:46 am
MG
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 276
Member Since:
February 16, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

AltaRed said

I also hope they start charging soon for utility payments, etc. Why should the bank shareholder (e.g. myself) pay for that service? If a customer doesn't like it, then pay the bills elsewhere. Try to do that at Zag or Oaken or EQ for example.

Hi AltaRed,
CIBC has been charging for bill payments for at least 2 decades now. The only way around it is if you have a special bank account that does not charge for debits or checks by keeping a minimum balance. And those accounts are slowing disappearing...

September 11, 2016
2:29 pm
AltaRed
BC Interior
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 3111
Member Since:
October 27, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I've used CIBC online Bill Payment for years until I left 2 years ago. Have never incurred a charge. Maybe you are referring to physically going into a branch and dumping the bills at a teller's counter for him/her to process?

Added: I've always carried a minimum balance of circa $1000 or so. Maybe that's the difference. But we are rapidly off-topic now.... More appropriate to a different thread.

No permission to create posts

Please write your comments in the forum.