8:32 pm
April 6, 2013
Schrodinger's Ape said
Loonie said You might also want to look at critical illness insurance. I'm not pushing it; just something to consider and decide if you want it. It too might be very expensive for a smoker. I have no personal experience with it except to say that I thought it was an expensive product even for someone who has never smoked.
We thought pretty much the same. He does have a small amount of critical illness coverage through work, as well as short and long term disability coverage. CN is pretty good about the benefits, thanks to the Steelworkers Union!
I like the idea of critical illness insurance. But, unfortunately, the policies I've seen are not like life insurance and disability insurance. Critical illness policies seem to cover specific listed illnesses. If one becomes critically ill and the illness is not one of the ones in the list, then there's no payout.
I think it is good to have a look at the policy and be aware of what would be covered and what would not be covered.
8:51 pm
April 12, 2016
Norman1 said It is not as easy as that. There is an actual physical addiction to the nicotine and it is not just psychological. I would be supportive even if he is able to gradually reduce how often he smokes instead of quitting "cold turkey".
From the research I've done, it's primarily psychological. Nicotine has a half-life of 1-2 hours and the physical withdrawal only lasts about a week. If you can make it through 2 weeks and you still want to smoke, then it's all psychological at that point. When you cut back without quitting, it basically puts you into permanent withdrawal.
It's like telling someone to overcome alcoholism by only having one drink a night. No one would dream of recommending that, but we tell smokers to try that all the time.
It's the habit that makes it so hard to quit, more than the physical addiction. People who smoke associate cigarettes with everything they do, everything they enjoy. Morning coffee? Have a cigarette. Cold brewsky after work? Have a cigarette. Coffee break, lunch break, driving home from work? Have a cigarette. Add to that the fact that so many people still smoke, especially in industries like the railroad, and you're constantly exposed to it. If you quit buying them, there's always someone to bum one off of.
I'm not saying there's no physical component, of course there is. But it's secondary to the psychological component. That's why all these smoking cessation aids (Nicorette, etc) do such good business... because they don't work!
9:15 pm
April 12, 2016
I like the idea of critical illness insurance. But, unfortunately, the policies I've seen are not like life insurance and disability insurance. Critical illness policies seem to cover specific listed illnesses. If one becomes critically ill and the illness is not one of the ones in the list, then there's no payout.
I think it is good to have a look at the policy and be aware of what would be covered and what would not be covered.
I went over the policies again today, turns out short and long term disability is what he has... not critical illness. The amounts aren't great.... short term wouldn't even cover the mortgage, and long term just barely does. But at least it's something. I'm going to look into increasing that too. His work policy is through GWS so probably just go with them to make coordination of benefits simpler.
In my digging, I also found out they increased the optional life insurance coverage amounts last February, so we've put in an application to bump that up. They also added optional spousal insurance, so we'll sign up for that too. We would still be considered "under insured" by industry standards (since it doesn't pay off our mortgage and give us enough money to live lavishly for years), but it would be enough to cover my living expenses for 5 years at our current lifestyle, and I wouldn't maintain this lifestyle if it was just me (e.g. I hate this big stupid house, I would move into a much smaller home).
EDIT: clarified 2nd paragraph
9:38 pm
October 21, 2013
I'm not sure which kind of insurance you're referring to in the second paragraph, but having adequate disability insurance trumps critical illness insurance any day as a "must have". It should provide enough income for you to live until you can get on your feet.
Does he not have sick days? Normally that's what passes for short-term, and is paid at full salary. After the sick days are used up, then the long term kicks in. At least that has been my experience.
Odds are pretty good that he will develop COPD at some point. Depending on how strenuous the job is, that may preclude him working at the same job thereafter.
How long does he have to go before he can retire?
I really hope he can quit smoking. The disability insurance, if you buy it outside the group plan, is going to be more expensive, just like the life insurance, because of this. And COPD is a miserable way to go. My father had it. I wonder if he realizes what he's letting himself in for.
A good friend of mine who was both a smoker and a heavy drinker and finally quit them both without any outside help says that quitting smoking is harder than quitting drinking. It was all about making up her mind to do it. She realized she was throwing her life and her money down the drain, and she was only in her 30s at the time. She's now over 70 and in great health - just retired at 74!
10:32 pm
April 12, 2016
Loonie said
I'm not sure which kind of insurance you're referring to in the second paragraph, but having adequate disability insurance trumps critical illness insurance any day as a "must have". It should provide enough income for you to live until you can get on your feet.
Does he not have sick days? Normally that's what passes for short-term, and is paid at full salary. After the sick days are used up, then the long term kicks in. At least that has been my experience.
Whoops, that was about life insurance. He has explicit short-term disability insurance that goes for 3 months at a ridiculously low amount. No paid sick days. We'd definitely be digging into the 6-month emergency fund at that point.
Then the LTD kicks in and is good for 5 years at 55% his base salary. We were just now talking about all this, and we've made some plans and contingencies. A lot of it amounts to the fact that I'm unhappy with our "Keeping up with the Jones" type lifestyle that we have now and yearning for a simpler life, which just happens to be exceedingly compatible with cutting down expenses. It just doesn't feel like a good "fit" to spend over a hundred dollars a month to buy additional coverage to maintain a lifestyle that isn't right for me in the first place. And in 3-4 months, I'll have a degree with excellent earning potential if it comes to that.
Odds are pretty good that he will develop COPD at some point. Depending on how strenuous the job is, that may preclude him working at the same job thereafter.
How long does he have to go before he can retire?
Yeah that would be a problem. He's on the radio a lot. His job isn't physically demanding, but he coordinates dozens of workers over several miles of track and it's pretty fast-paced. And screwing up gets people killed. That said, there are lots of easier jobs in the workforce that he could do if he had to. The yards have office jobs that are pretty lush, they just don't pay as much (no OT) and drive him crazy with boredom. But push come to shove, there are options.
I really hope he can quit smoking. The disability insurance, if you buy it outside the group plan, is going to be more expensive, just like the life insurance, because of this. And COPD is a miserable way to go. My father had it. I wonder if he realizes what he's letting himself in for.
Me too. I never expected to date a smoker, let alone marry one. I guess life doesn't always care about your expectations! But knowing how well he responds to nagging (extremely negatively), there's not a lot I can do about it. So I choose not to worry, because that would just affect my own health and happiness and do nothing about the problem.
10:45 pm
October 21, 2013
10:51 pm
April 12, 2016
1:57 pm
October 11, 2015
I'm very impressed with your level of knowledge and your diligence in handling the money in your home, particularly with your husband's lack of discipline in saving. He is lucky to have you and you are lucky that he listens to you!!
I've used financial planners for the past 35 years and have never done well--i suspect that had i put all the money in gic's i would be at the same place.
Having said that, I have about 40% of my money invested--most of it using financial planners--who i agree, tend to pad their own pockets.
The globe and mail has written often about Mawer Funds (based in Calgary). I put some money in there about 2 years ago and it has done reasonably well--considering the market conditions--i'm getting about 7-8% on the Tax effective balanced global fund. The fees are "all in" and you can buy without an agent--in fact financial planners will not promote these fees since they make no commission on them. I recently switched most of my portfolio to Scotiawealth and my new advisor told me that she has Mawer funds as well!!!
I do think that you should try and put some money in the market--just not all of it!!
That is why i have become a "regular" on this forum. If i can get 2% (or higher) with NO RISK, then i'm pretty happy. (although 3% is better!!)
Look into the Mawer Funds and keep up the good work!
2:46 pm
October 21, 2013
"Bill", on this forum, has also recommended Mawer Balanced Fund as has someone else whom I can't recall.
If you are to buy them on your own, they require a minimum of 50K, which is probably too much for OP right now, so she would have to go through some kind of broker, where the minimum is 5K. The MER is, as I recall, somewhere around .93 . These are actively managed mutual funds, not ETFs. The tax-advantaged fund is best for non-registered funds.
Dentgal - I have wondered how the Tax-advantaged fund works out at tax time. Can you give any insight? Do you know how it broke down for your return? - i.e. how much of the gain turned out to be dividends, cap gains, interest?
7:17 pm
October 11, 2015
Hi Loonie:
i wish that I could help you with your question. I gave all my papers to the accountant and he filed my taxes electronically. There were lots of T3's and T4's and T5's. I'm just not savvy in this field.
Update--just checked my Mawer--started with $200K in July 2014. Now have over $216=over 8%. Wayyy better than my other investments.
They offer all funds such as US funds which I believe have done very well, but so far I've just stayed in the balanced fund.
When I get my return back, I'll try to figure it out (but probably won't be able to!)
8:47 pm
April 6, 2013
Loonie said
Thanks for the article about Aceto's investing style, Norman. I find it interesting, and more revealing than I would have expected.
His strategy, though, of dividing his assets between simple DIY and full service wealth manager, is only useful for people who have quite a large portfolio. The guys who make all the decisions etc usually won't deal with anything less than 500K, and you get a better deal if you give them a million plus, at least from what I have observed.
A personalized managed portfolio of stocks is not necessary. One could get very similar results with actively managed mutual funds that have modest costs, like the mutual funds from Mawer Investment Management or from PH&N Investment Services.
But I think that Norman's point in bringing this to our attention is that DIY can be very dangerous, and everyone can benefit from at least a second opinion.
....
Not everyone can do DIY investing successfully. It will cost money to find out!
Aceto showed good judgment. After learning he does not have the knack for being a landlord, he got out of rental properties. After learning he doesn't have the skill to successfully invest directly in stocks, he hired an investment manager to invest in individual stocks.
Many years ago, I had mixed results. I wondered if I was cut out to be a successful DIY investor. To compare my results with professional management, I put some money into a conservative equity fund.
To see if my efforts were adding or destroying value, I compared the overall return, including the fund, with the return of just the fund. If I was mostly destroying value, then I should just invest all my money in the fund and find something else to spend my time on.
8:56 pm
April 6, 2013
Schrodinger's Ape said
From the research I've done, it's primarily psychological. Nicotine has a half-life of 1-2 hours and the physical withdrawal only lasts about a week. If you can make it through 2 weeks and you still want to smoke, then it's all psychological at that point. When you cut back without quitting, it basically puts you into permanent withdrawal.
...
It's the habit that makes it so hard to quit, more than the physical addiction. People who smoke associate cigarettes with everything they do, everything they enjoy. Morning coffee? Have a cigarette. Cold brewsky after work? Have a cigarette. Coffee break, lunch break, driving home from work? Have a cigarette. ....I'm not saying there's no physical component, of course there is. But it's secondary to the psychological component. That's why all these smoking cessation aids (Nicorette, etc) do such good business... because they don't work!
Thanks for that insight. That explains why a few people, like my Dad, didn't seem to have much difficulty quitting. There was no Nicorette way back then.
9:51 pm
April 6, 2013
dentgal said
Hi Loonie:
i wish that I could help you with your question. I gave all my papers to the accountant and he filed my taxes electronically. There were lots of T3's and T4's and T5's. I'm just not savvy in this field.
Update--just checked my Mawer--started with $200K in July 2014. Now have over $216=over 8%. Wayyy better than my other investments.
They offer all funds such as US funds which I believe have done very well, but so far I've just stayed in the balanced fund.
When I get my return back, I'll try to figure it out (but probably won't be able to!)
There is a table attached to the T3 slips from Mawer that breaks down the distributions by eligible dividend, other than eligible dividend, foreign income, and capital gains.
The Mawer Tax Effective Balanced Fund seems to try to minimize only the amount of capital gains distributions. There's more details in this BNN Fund Tracker interview Keeping your returns out of the tax man's pockets.
10:04 pm
October 21, 2013
7:18 pm
April 12, 2016
Update:
I read a few books and made some big and small changes. On personal finances in general, Wealthy Barber and WB Returns were both great, I really enjoyed "Stop Over-Thinking Your Money!" and "Wealthing Like Rabbits" was ok but I didn't feel it added much after the other 3. On investing, I really enjoyed "Naked Investor: Why Almost Everybody But You Gets Rich On Your RRSP." It didn't really change any of what I was planning (since indexed e-series funds fit in well with not buying mutual funds that only make your adviser rich), but it gave me a lot of confidence that I wasn't making a huge mistake going at it without an advisor. As I suspected, there's not much an adviser can do that you can't do yourself, if you get educated about finances and stick to a plan. There's another book I read, "Fight Back: 81 Ways to Help You Save Money and Protect Yourself from Corporate Trickery" which was a worthwhile read but incredibly dry and poorly written; but it did have some good tips I hadn't thought of myself, so I reluctantly recommend it.
I think I've got it mostly under control now. I've moved our Investors Group assets to e-series (Couch Potato Assertive portfolio), set-up a 10% savings plan and 20% RRSP as per Wealthy Barber, gotten our life insurance in order, written wills (with a lawyer), and eliminated much of our cash positions in favour of using an LOC if necessary (if the $5000 we keep at TD in chequeing to make our account fee-free isn't enough). Because I've always been a strict budgeter, those percentages are just my "pay yourself first" money, then I pay the bills and set aside the money for my virtual envelopes, and then the balance also goes into savings. We've also put aside money for a trip to Thailand in January (a little prematurely I think, since now it's sitting in cash for the next 6 months for no reason).
I've still got more liquid cash than I'd like, mainly because it's tied up in bank TFSAs and the fees to transfer it will outweigh any difference in growth, likewise if I withdraw it the taxes will do the same. I'll take care of that in December.
RRSP-wise, we have a bit of a mix. Some of it is still at Tangerine, again because of the TFSA transfer fees. Some of it is in DH's Sunlife group plan, but the fees are quite reasonable (~0.5%) and it comes right off the paycheque which is convenient. The investments seem to track their benchmarks, so I think they're good enough. When we cashed out of IG, we put the lot into a spousal RRSP in my name, so this year's tax refund should also provide a nice savings boost.
In the process, my husband's RV bit the dust and we paid cash for a new-to-him 40' beast. All-in, that ate up $47,000 of our savings, but he's paying it back at 4% interest out of his per diem, so that works. More importantly, he's now happy in his home-away-from-home. Can't put a price on sanity! He also loves bragging to all his co-workers that he paid cash after sacrificing for 5 years in a '87 Winnebago... (It's funny to me how effortlessly he can live off $300 less a week when he's "paying back a loan" but not to "save up" for the exact same thing. He's a product of the times I guess...)
Come December, I'll be able to amalgamate a lot more and it will simplify even further. That will be important if I happen to die first, because DH is terrible with bookkeeping so the few accounts he has to close, the better.
9:15 pm
October 21, 2013
Sounds like you are off to a good start. I have read all except Rabbits, as well as a number of others, and generally agree with your responses. Warren MacKenzie also has some useful stuff to say that the same level or slightly higher - older now but not always dated. Advice that has already stood the test of time may actually be more useful in some ways.
I congratulate you on your ability to take action!
Nice that DH got his new "home" as well.
I still think you're a bit short on emergency cash. Personally, I wouldn't want to have to access LOC, but that's up to you. I have to shell out about 7K for new AC and new furnace this week.
2:51 am
April 12, 2016
Loonie said I still think you're a bit short on emergency cash. Personally, I wouldn't want to have to access LOC, but that's up to you. I have to shell out about 7K for new AC and new furnace this week.
Ahh, but you're forgetting about my dear Big Spender!
Most of the financial planning books I read recommend only a few thousand for emergency and a low interest secured LOC for emergencies, mostly because true emergencies are rare and "emergency wants" get more and more likely the more cash you have sitting around. My husband is hugely susceptible to that syndrome! Whereas you and your wife seem to be much more sensible in that department, so cash isn't as "risky" for you as it is for me.
Another consideration is his income... we put a lot in savings every month while still living a high quality of life, so if something came up, we have LOTS of room to scale back for a month or two.
We have 3 months living expenses saved plus we could move into our basement suite, rent out the upstairs for the cost of the mortgage, and pay utilities only. Or move into the RV and rent them both out!! Speaking of the RV, with our credit ratings and his income, we should be able to get a secured LOC with a fairly low rate.
But the biggest consideration is the "Husband Factor." Accounts full of cash offend him to no end. "Wants" become "needs" very quickly, and I can only object so much. They are his earnings, after all. For whatever reason, investment assets don't seem to tempt him. Maybe because they have better growth potential? Savings accounts just sit there, not even keeping up with inflation. And honestly, I agree with that being a problem... just not with the method to protect purchasing power. My solution is invest so it grows faster than inflation. His solution is to power purchase now before he's dead!
Bottom line, investing it and risking the use of LOC is unquestionably preferable to keeping it liquid only to have him find excuses to spend it. I'd much rather lose the interest borrowing $10,000 once than lose the $10,000 principle every 3 months!
10:27 am
October 21, 2013
Personally, I wouldn't go for a secured LOC, especially if you think you're not going to use it anyway. The rate may be lower, but there are costs to set it up, as it's a lien, and costs to take it off later. I'd just take an unsecured one. If it starts to look like you're going to be using it regularly, then switch to secured.
If frittering it away is the alternative, then, yes, you're better off without a lot of access to cash.
9:42 am
January 3, 2013
Hi. Have you considered investing in ETFs? You will have the luxury of selling / buying whenever / whatever you want without being tied to Mutual funds and their high fees.
I don't mean use all your investing and put it in ETFs. You can still keep the 3% interest rates (if any) with others but start investing in ETFs slowly and gradually while learning more and more every day.
If you start doing this, you need to be very careful on what and how much to buy. People can become greedy! I was when I started and that was good tough lesson
One more option would be to buy quality stocks with high yield dividends. I usually read http://www.fool.ca daily. You can get valuable information there.
11:17 am
April 12, 2016
Yas said
Hi. Have you considered investing in ETFs? You will have the luxury of selling / buying whenever / whatever you want without being tied to Mutual funds and their high fees.
I know about ETFs and they're not appropriate for our portfolio at this time.
Mutual funds don't necessarily have higher fees than ETFs. It depends on the value of your portfolio, and how often you plan to trade your ETFs. If you're below the family asset threshold, most brokers also charge quarterly fees. In our case, we make 8 biweekly purchases (4 funds in each of our names). Even at a low cost brokerage, that would add up PDQ. Of course if you were paying per-trade, you wouldn't do it as frequently... but then you're losing some dollar cost averaging, which is why I prefer mutual funds at least until we have enough assets that it makes sense to switch over. Then I'll probably continue making bi-weekly purchases of the mutual funds, and then rebalance the entire portfolio and move the new funds into ETFs once a year. Then I'm only paying the MER's on the newer funds, and only paying one set of trading fees per year.
Yas said I don't mean use all your investing and put it in ETFs. You can still keep the 3% interest rates (if any) with others but start investing in ETFs slowly and gradually while learning more and more every day.
Where in the world are you getting 3% interest rates??
One more option would be to buy quality stocks with high yield dividends. I usually read http://www.fool.ca daily. You can get valuable information there.
Now you're talking about "how to be an investor" not "how to build a financial plan." I'm not interested in following stock market news, trying to time the market, etc. To me, that's no different than gambling, except you're doing it with your life savings. Nooo thank you!
Please write your comments in the forum.