July Inflation | Page 2 | General financial discussion | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
July Inflation
August 19, 2021
9:32 am
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9399
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Norman1 said
That's great for your dentist to retire early and perhaps doing something more enjoyable. But, there's no shortage of dentists.

Around here, dental clinics have been popping up in all the major malls and even in the small strip malls. If one's dentist retires, just go to the next closest mall or strip mall.

There's no shortage of labour for farm harvesting. The positions are just not competitive. I can get the same minimum wage working in an air-conditioned insect-free fast food restaurant, instead of working out in a field somewhere in the hot sun.

I think lots of the labour shortages are from lack of child care. That restaurant will have trouble getting their staff back when the kids are attending school remotely at home instead of going in person to school.
...................

Yes, I've heard stories about restaurants hiking prices substantially. Supposedly, one restaurant in town hiked the price of their plates from something like $14.99 to $29.99! Well, good luck with that!

If that nice tenderloin steak at a restaurant goes from 5X the grocery store price to 10X, then it becomes really worthwhile for me to cook it myself at home.  

Yes, I know there is a surplus of dentists. As I said earlier, the retiring dentist is the person I happen to know about personally. There are others in other jobs who are also retiring earlier than intended according to media reports.

Very few restaurants are going to be crazy enough to hike prices 100%. Most will go for about 10-20%. I'm willing to pay that for the restaurants I want to stay open, but I only do takeout or delivery. Food prices will continue to rise, so that the margin between cooking at home and restaurant food may not be as great as expected. More likely, people will buy cheaper foods or go to cheaper restaurants. As someone else said, these prices will not go down. And there are media reports that there will be food shortages in various parts of the world this winter due to climate issues.

A drive around Leamington or Bradford or Beaverton (in Ontario) or any number of other places suggests that farm labor is mostly provided by temporary foreign workers, who do much more than harvest work. Normally, they can be seen on the rural roads on bicycles, but those may be scarce this year. A couple of years ago, the anglican cathedral in Toronto was collecting used bikes to donate to the temporary foreign farm worker in the Beaverton area. There is no competition from local workers because the pay is too low to even support the travel required to get to work. A long time ago, I did farm labour for a short while. We hitchhiked and camped. I wouldn't recommend it. The only kind of farm work that paid decently in southwestern Ontario was tobacco. It was hard work, but I think it's all gone now.

A friend of ours ordered a new bike in early Spring. Eventually he cancelled the order as there was no hope of receiving it this year and they could not give him any idea when it might arrive.

Lack of affordable day care is a perennial problem, exacerbated by the pandemic. People with decent jobs seem to have been able to work at home when schools are closed, form what I've seen. It's the people with crappy jobs that have been really stuck; if they quit work to look after their kids, they can't pay the rent.

August 19, 2021
10:11 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4024
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

COIN, I agree. You can get away with some money printing for a while but at some point, because lots of money's available, providers increase prices to get at it, then wages rise in response, and you're off to the races if you continue to print/borrow in response. A textbook case is 1920s Germany: unpayable debt, poverty, thus gov't money printing in response led to hyperinflation in a few short years. It had nothing to do with changing consumer behaviour, people just deciding to start chasing more stuff all of a sudden, it was all about unpayable debts.

When a consumer pays money for something, that money is not out of circulation, it's used by the new owner of it to pay higher wages to lure staff, buy supplies, for personal wealth and consumption, etc, etc, etc, so now it continues to circulate in the economy. With more money circulating with no corresponding increase in stuff available to buy prices go up, e.g. house prices in GTA way up do to infusion of foreign and other money - demand (money availability) up, supply constrained, inflation.

August 19, 2021
11:09 am
cgouimet
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1549
Member Since:
February 7, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I try not to worry too much about 1 or 2 data points. We need more that that to see the real trend.

The pandemic has had a major impact on a lot of things. Last year's lockdowns significantly reduced demand for gasoline and prices dropped due to oversupply. Now they're back up vs last year but not that much higher than before the pandemic.

The lockdowns also reduced supply of renovation materials while demand went way up as people chose to renovate and upgrade appliances. This are stabilizing. Wholesale prices are dropping. Retail prices will drop eventually as demand stabilizes and competition returns to normal.

People working, studying and playing from home, drove up the demand for personal electronics, shifting production away from automotive electronics (car sales were way down since we weren't driving) to personal electronics creating the auto shortages we're experiencing now as we want new ones again. But this will stabilize soon too ...

I'm more concerned with food supply and prices personally as climate change is creating significant crop issues around the world this year. Some of us may want, but not really need, new cars but all of us need new food every day/week/month.

CGO
August 19, 2021
11:17 am
cgouimet
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1549
Member Since:
February 7, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

One more thing on food and grocery prices ...

As we locked down, supply chains were significantly disrupted. We wanted more meat and toilet paper from Loblaws, Costco and other retailers while demand hotels, restaurants and offices disappeared.

Same cattle and same pulp but totally different supply chains. For example, none of us are in the market for the same toilet paper offices buy ... 🙂

CGO
August 19, 2021
12:24 pm
COIN
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1133
Member Since:
March 15, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
August 19, 2021
12:33 pm
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4024
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Lot of sense to what you say, cgouimet.

The normal market variables will revert once the pandemic eases worldwide, I think we all agree here, the difference I think is that some folks think governments printing/borrowing heretofore astronomical amounts in the last year and a half, deficits risen by hundreds of per cent, will have a major inflationary effect at some point whereas others think it won't.

Climate change is the least of my worries, you can find lots of sentiment like this too: "Some aspects of climate change look promising for farming: longer frost-free seasons, increases in growing degree days, and even increased atmospheric CO2 can, in theory, lead to better crop yields and productivity."

Also, UN FAO "forecast for global cereal production in 2021 has been lowered marginally since the previous report in June to 2 817 million tonnes, but still 1.7 percent (47.8 million tonnes) higher than in 2020 and would mark a new record high" is the first hit what I google "world food production 2021".

And food production is not an issue, the problems are in distribution. And a huge amount of wastage (UN says about 17% of production, NPOs that want us to feel bad about ourselves usually cite about 1/3) and that's something we can fairly easily improve on for sure.

August 21, 2021
4:18 am
savemoresaveoften
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 2994
Member Since:
March 30, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Speaking of food wastage, there are apparently different standards in place that odd shaping veggies will get tossed out even tho they are perfectly fine. Something about ‘uniform shape’ criteria….

As to office vs home toilet paper, that is a genius response lol

August 22, 2021
8:46 am
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 997
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Money supply has expanded dramatically.

The excess money is going some place. Surprisingly (sarcasm) its flowing into the assets with limited supply that people want. Houses. Stocks. Bitcoin. Gold. Anything with limited supply.

Certain things won’t be impacted. Netflix and Facebook services, for example. Why? Because the supply is limitless.

Other prices are impacted to a lesser extent. Food? People do want it but you can only eat so much.

Of course, CPI ignores prices of assets people actually want and with limited supply, be it houses or gold.

We are also experiencing rolling deficits: toilet paper, fridges, bathtubs, cars… That’s another form of inflation. To correct it the prices need to jump but they are being artificially held down so the market responds with shortages. CPI is happily ignoring the shortages.

So, a person with a million dollars in Jan 2020 was quite a lot richer than one today. And CPI does not begin to reflect it. Actual inflation is much higher than 4%. Averaging and talking about 2% just adds to the level of incredulity from people buying things today rather than in March 2020.

Central bankers are human. Politicians are human. Being honest on this issue will make people feel like they did a bad job. So they are defending themselves by denying the obvious. And saying “its a blip” and “monetary policy does not matter”.

August 22, 2021
12:26 pm
Kidd
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 840
Member Since:
February 27, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

mordko said
Politicians are human.  

Maybe so... BUT they're the lowest of the low. Pond scum is more to my liking. I'd rather have a bad case of athlete's foot, than associate with a politician. Just typing the word "politician" makes my gut ache. Canada had such great potential and then 3 tiers of government took over.

I need an over taxed drink.

August 22, 2021
12:30 pm
cgouimet
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1549
Member Since:
February 7, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I think I'll move on to other threads ...

CGO
August 23, 2021
2:32 am
RetirEd
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1175
Member Since:
November 18, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

If a country increases its money supply, creating temporary money, it may have to be paid back (the money taken out of circulation has to be bought from someone) at some point. Central banks have a lot of control over this, though, and more experience and perspective than ancient Rome. Better input data and more tools to control the economy.

But the housing and environmental problems demand that we limit population growth. Nobody out there is even willing to talk about it, because all the supply-siders have been counting on ever-larger populations of poor people to provide for them. And, damnit, keep your paws off my pension! sf-yellsf-smile

RetirEd

August 23, 2021
5:22 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4024
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

RetirEd, UN says less than 10% of world population in "absolute poverty", steady decreases from 1800 when they figure it was around 80%. Wherever is increased prosperity provided by free-market capitalism is declining birth rate, female liberation, birth control, etc. Not to worry, we're going the right way, at least right now.

August 23, 2021
7:32 am
Kidd
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 840
Member Since:
February 27, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bill said
RetirEd, UN says less than 10% of world population in "absolute poverty", steady decreases from 1800 when they figure it was around 80%. 

i (me being me) believe that 10% figure is underestimated. Safety nets have been put into place such as Welfare and Employment Insurance to help those in need. The issue being, those programs need to be funded by someone. Today, there's no will to earn that dollar, when the dollar is given for free, while you sleep in to 11 am.

i will agree, there are times when a person may need assistance, need support but the sad reality is, this free ride never ends for these individuals, it becomes their canadian way of life.sf-frown

August 23, 2021
7:44 am
Kidd
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 840
Member Since:
February 27, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Here's a wack of good reading on the subject of "Debt and Deficits" from the Fraser Institute.

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/categories/deficits-debt

August 23, 2021
10:41 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7205
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

RetirEd said
If a country increases its money supply, creating temporary money, it may have to be paid back (the money taken out of circulation has to be bought from someone) at some point. Central banks have a lot of control over this, though, and more experience and perspective than ancient Rome. …

The money is paid back. Bank of Canada created the money and bought treasury bills, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, and government bonds with the money. When they mature, the money comes back to the Bank of Canada.

The money spent on treasury bills, commercial paper, and bankers’ acceptances have come back already, with interest. The money in bonds will come back when the bonds mature. That money can come back earlier when a pension fund, investment fund, or ETF wishes to buy bonds. Bank of Canada is quite happy to supply those bonds and get the money back.

When the money comes back, the Bank of Canada is not going to chase consumer goods with the money and push up consumer inflation. The money will sit in an account. That why I see that silly picture of money chasing goods as bogus.

August 23, 2021
10:53 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7205
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Kidd said
Here's a wack of good reading on the subject of "Debt and Deficits" from the Fraser Institute.

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/categories/deficits-debt  

Sounds like garbage.

Interest rate is locked in when the government issues the bond. When 30-year bonds are issued with a coupon of 2% per year, the interest will be 2% per year for the next 30 years. Doesn't matter if interest rates go up or down afterwards.

That's why one sees that the federal government is still paying 8% per annum on $2.3 billion of its debt and will continue to do so until the CA135087UT96 bonds mature June 2023.

In fact, the federal government could roll that $2.3 billion over at 2% in June 2023, borrow another $4.6 billion at 2%, and still be paying less interest than before at 8%!

August 23, 2021
12:01 pm
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4024
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

So if money creation is cool (and why would a gov't ever borrow on the markets if just creating money is the way to go?), Norman1, what did countries that have experienced severe inflation do wrong? Is it that they left it all out in the economy instead of (eventually) just letting it "sit in an account"? If I understand what you're saying looks like I can drop my fear of inflation, and for me that would be cool!

August 23, 2021
2:12 pm
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 997
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Norman1 said

Sounds like garbage.

Interest rate is locked in when the government issues the bond. When 30-year bonds are issued with a coupon of 2% per year, the interest will be 2% per year for the next 30 years. Doesn't matter if interest rates go up or down afterwards.

That's why one sees that the federal government is still paying 8% per annum on $2.3 billion of its debt and will continue to do so until the CA135087UT96 bonds mature June 2023.

In fact, the federal government could roll that $2.3 billion over at 2% in June 2023, borrow another $4.6 billion at 2%, and still be paying less interest than before at 8%!  

I don’t see any conflict between your summary and the linked article. At the end of 2020 the weighted average coupon paid by the government of Canada was 2.03%.

The Government issues bonds of various durations; so bonds with different rates will be maturing in 2023 but its not unreasonable to assume that its 2% on average. Of course given the fast growing structural debt, the government will need to borrow quite a bit above and beyond the face value of maturing bonds. We don’t know if the current 4% CPI is a “blip” or not. If not, the interest rates and cost of servicing debt could jump substantially from the current 2%. Thats not a certainty but a major risk given our debt and deficit. Do you not agree?

August 23, 2021
3:34 pm
Vatox
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1218
Member Since:
October 29, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The countries that have severe inflation kept on printing, post World War II Germany had the presses printing 24/7 and even hired companies to run more presses. We aren’t doing that. So as long as we don’t flood the world with Canadian cash, it won’t be serious. The problem arises when the rest of the world doesn’t want your cash anymore because they all have mounds of it in their basements already. That means it’s brutal to try and purchase imported goods and hence inflation. The inflation we are seeing now is from supply problems, not the emergency money printing.

August 23, 2021
4:14 pm
mordko
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 997
Member Since:
April 27, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Late 20s, early 1930s Germany was a special case. Reparations, French occupation of Ruhr, crisis and almost deliberate sabotage of currency by the government to deal with debt combined to produce something unique in terms of inflation. A very unlikely scenario.

But thats not the only scenario. A 10% inflation is still quite nasty, particularly to peoples savings.

No permission to create posts

Please write your comments in the forum.