Is gifted money to spouse considered a taxable income? | Page 2 | General financial discussion | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Is gifted money to spouse considered a taxable income?
April 26, 2020
10:29 am
Save2Retire@55
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 848
Member Since:
January 3, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Norman1 said

Save2Retire@55 said

Perfect. Guess CRA didn't leave us any choice of trying to balance the family income. Also, it is funny when they want to give anything (Child Benefit, etc), they do the math based on the whole family income but when we want to take any advantage, we have to do individuals. Oh well!

That's what happens when people start "abusing" the tax system.

It became highly unfair as wealthy taxpayers could benefit disproportionately by gifting spouses and children amounts like $100,000 to save their families thousands of dollars each year. Each child, for example, has a basic personal amount that could shelter over $10,000 of income a year.  

I agree but instead of punishing everyone, the government can put a cap and make different brackets for the income generated from a gifted amount. But yeah, we discussing it here won't change anything. I will just move the money back to avoid headache.

April 26, 2020
10:56 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4024
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Norman1, I know there's a ton of jurisprudence over the years right on up to Supreme Court re interest deductibility, I don't really keep up on it. Are you aware of any cases that deal with interest deductibility re. loans taken out to earn bank account interest, or even buying GICs or similar interest bearing instruments? (I'm familiar with the clarity re dividend income.) Or even any explicit references in CRA material that make it clear? I'd be very interested, thanks.

April 26, 2020
11:35 am
pooreva
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 440
Member Since:
April 2, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

How can anybody prove that money spouse B earns as GIC interest is mutual money spouses A+B have if GIC is in B's name only (not joint account)???
My thinking is if spouse A has $100k in GIC in single account and spouse B has $100k in single account at tax time they both claim interest from $100k each? GICs are not opened as joint accounts...

April 26, 2020
11:46 am
Kidd
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 840
Member Since:
February 27, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Pooreva.

Without me googling this answer, i believe you are correct.

Tax is declared by whoever's name appears on the T5.

April 26, 2020
11:49 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4024
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

pooreva, you're right, in your example. But I think GICs can be purchased jointly.

And I don't think this stuff matters for 95% of folks, CRA would never pick it up or even much care unless it's a large amount. But say wealthy A has had lots of interest income and all of a sudden spouse B, who previously showed little income, has lots (or else it's newly in a joint account with B as the primary SIN and thus is now starting to report it) and A now has little, then it might catch CRA's attention and they'll want to find out how come B's up while A's down. I think the burden of proof will then be on A & B to explain, and then whatever tax rules apply will kick in.

April 26, 2020
1:21 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7204
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Also, the legal registration of the GIC's is not relevant. It is the source of those funds that determines which spouse owes the income taxes on the interest.

Because Tax Court proceedings are not under criminal law, there is no presumption of innocence of the taxpayer and CRA does not need to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Instead, the judge would look at what the taxpayer and CRA presents and decide which story is, on the balance of probabilities (probability over 50%), the real one.

Should CRA be able to demonstrate that, on the balance of probabilities, the funds came from spouse A and not spouse B, then CRA would win the case and can then attribute the interest back to spouse A.

Spouse B needs to keep evidence supporting that he/she was the source of that $100,000.

April 26, 2020
2:27 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7204
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bill said
… Are you aware of any cases that deal with interest deductibility re. loans taken out to earn bank account interest, or even buying GICs or similar interest bearing instruments? (I'm familiar with the clarity re dividend income.) Or even any explicit references in CRA material that make it clear? I'd be very interested, thanks.

Line 22100 (Carrying charges and interest expenses) instructions include interest paid to earn interest:

Claim the following carrying charges and interest you paid to earn income from investments:

  • most interest you pay on money you borrow for investment purposes but generally only if you use it to try to earn investment income, including interest and dividends. However, if the only earnings your investment can produce are capital gains, you cannot claim the interest you paid

Income Tax Folio S3-F6-C1, Interest Deductibility mentions Supreme Court case Ludco Enterprises Ltd. et al. v The Queen.

In 1.27 of the folio, CRA notes the qualifying income is any "amount that would come into income for taxation purposes" and not necessarily income that is or would be sufficient to overcome the interest paid/deducted:

Income
1.27 It is a further requirement of subparagraph 20(1)(c)(i) that to be deducted, interest be payable on borrowed money used for the purpose of earning income from a business or property. The interpretation of the term income was addressed in Ludco as follows:

... [I]t is clear that "income" in s. 20(1)(c)(i) refers to income generally, that is, an amount that would come into income for taxation purposes, not just net income.

The court also said:

The plain meaning of s. 20(1)(c)(i) does not support an interpretation of "income" as the equivalent of "profit" or "net income".... Therefore, absent a sham or window dressing or similar vitiating circumstances, courts should not be concerned with the sufficiency of the income expected or received.

Accounting firm BDO Canada writes in Continue to deduct interest on your investment loan the following about interest paid on borrowings to earn interest or dividends:

Where you have borrowed to purchase investments that pay interest or dividends, remember that you can continue to deduct interest on the loan even if that investment is sold for a loss. …

April 26, 2020
3:45 pm
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4024
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

That's great, Norman1, helps a lot, thanks for you research! It's very clear. No idea why I thought there might be an issue, I'm probably "misremembering" or confusing something else from years ago.

April 27, 2020
8:38 am
pooreva
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 440
Member Since:
April 2, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Kidd said
Pooreva.

Without me googling this answer, i believe you are correct.

Tax is declared by whoever's name appears on the T5.  

But if both names appear on one receipt (since it is joint account), can you just split amount anyway you want and spouse A claims 30% and spouse B claims 70% ???

April 27, 2020
9:22 am
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4024
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

pooreva, technically, by the book, the interest has to be reported by whoever's money it is, regardless of the slip. So, for example, if the money came from a couple's joint money, i.e. money that each had equally contributed, then, by the book, each should report 50%. That's the rule.

The real question is does CRA care about the rule. My experience with joint bank accounts has been that CRA's accepted whatever I've reported, though I've tried to head off any questions. I've sometimes sent along a note explaining how I was splitting it and why, regardless of what the SIN on the slip was, I never, ever, heard back from them, they seemed ok with it. They probably checked the other joint owner, saw the rest of it being reported there, and were happy, amounts weren't in the millions and tax rates were not more than one level different between us. For some years now I just report based on SIN on the slip, too much bother to send note, do calculations, etc, and they again seem completely fine with that, zero queries from them.

April 27, 2020
11:14 am
GICinvestor
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 670
Member Since:
April 26, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Bill said
pooreva, technically, by the book, the interest has to be reported by whoever's money it is, regardless of the slip. So, for example, if the money came from a couple's joint money, i.e. money that each had equally contributed, then, by the book, each should report 50%. That's the rule.

The real question is does CRA care about the rule. My experience with joint bank accounts has been that CRA's accepted whatever I've reported, though I've tried to head off any questions. I've sometimes sent along a note explaining how I was splitting it and why, regardless of what the SIN on the slip was, I never, ever, heard back from them, they seemed ok with it. They probably checked the other joint owner, saw the rest of it being reported there, and were happy, amounts weren't in the millions and tax rates were not more than one level different between us. For some years now I just report based on SIN on the slip, too much bother to send note, do calculations, etc, and they again seem completely fine with that, zero queries from them.  

Exactly!

But from what I have heard....hearsay.....over the years your interest split must be the same every year on your joint investments.

Also I have said this before. And perhaps this option only works for the elderly. Do your joint interest at 50-50 and then do your income splitting. Then do your joint interest at 100-0 or 30-70 and then do your income splitting. Your tax payable or refund will be same. I would love to meet the mathematician that formulated our tax forms.

Also a relative said to me that at my income level I would get back all of my medical expenses. Firstly this person was wrong in thinking we are of a low income. And some totally overlook that your RRSP and RRIF is income when cashed in.
So just to understand that your medical expenses work like this.
Enter your eligible medical expenses
Minus the lower of $2352 or 3% of your net income
Equals your tax credit if a positive number
Then times that positive number by 15%
That amount is now deducted from your federal taxes payable

So medical expenses have a deductible amount of say $0 to $2352 and then after that deductible you only receive 15% back.

Also any one who claims over $5000, expect to be audited and be prepared to provide authentic official receipts and/or Doctors certificates.

April 27, 2020
1:19 pm
BillieBob
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 163
Member Since:
November 6, 2018
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

GICinvestor said
Also any one who claims over $5000, expect to be audited and be prepared to provide authentic official receipts and/or Doctors certificates.  

I claimed just over $11,000 in medical expenses on my 2019 return. I certainly hope I don't have to suffer the pain of a tax audit as well.

April 27, 2020
2:00 pm
GICinvestor
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 670
Member Since:
April 26, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

BillieBob said

I claimed just over $11,000 in medical expenses on my 2019 return. I certainly hope I don't have to suffer the pain of a tax audit as well.  

I have always done my own taxes on a software program. I had a lot of dental work done one year. When I did the entries somewhere along the line the software warned me of a likely audit due to claiming over $5,000. And then I received the request to provide documentation. I forget if it was mailed or emailed. So all I had to do was make all my receipts into PDF and they you send the info back. If I recall you do it though your "My Account" or though the CRA website and they give you an identity code along with it. I had one questionable receipt that I wrote an explanation on. A short while after I was informed that all was ok.

So the fears of sitting sweating in a room being in crossfire with numerous CRA Super Accountants and a pile of 10 years worth of paperwork doesn't happen.

April 27, 2020
2:46 pm
Winnie
Ontario
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 473
Member Since:
December 7, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

GICinvestor said

Also any one who claims over $5000, expect to be audited and be prepared to provide authentic official receipts and/or Doctors certificates.  

True. I claimed $9000 and also received the request to provide documentation. Provided via "My Account" and everything was fine, no additional questions, etc.

April 27, 2020
2:52 pm
BillieBob
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 163
Member Since:
November 6, 2018
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

GICinvestor said

I have always done my own taxes on a software program. I had a lot of dental work done one year. When I did the entries somewhere along the line the software warned me of a likely audit due to claiming over $5,000. And then I received the request to provide documentation. I forget if it was mailed or emailed. So all I had to do was make all my receipts into PDF and they you send the info back. If I recall you do it though your "My Account" or though the CRA website and they give you an identity code along with it. I had one questionable receipt that I wrote an explanation on. A short while after I was informed that all was ok.

So the fears of sitting sweating in a room being in crossfire with numerous CRA Super Accountants and a pile of 10 years worth of paperwork doesn't happen.  

A small portion of my expenses were dental but most are related to cancer treatments and medications, and include mileage expenses, etc. for daily travel over 7 weeks to a major city for treatments so receipts for some things will be difficult to obtain. I did keep a mileage log though.

I have received my Notice of Assessment but I'm guessing that a request for receipts can still happen after that.

April 27, 2020
3:15 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9398
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

It's not hard to rack up over 5K in medical expenses, especially if you have extended health insurance and/or travel health insurance and are a senior.

April 27, 2020
4:07 pm
Bill
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4024
Member Since:
September 11, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

BillieBob, re mileage log, etc, here's a link to CRA Guide RC4065, Medical Expenses (scroll up to top), it has a section on Travel Expenses and in that section there's another link to options re how to calculate travel expenses, etc. Maybe you already know.
https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/forms-publications/publications/rc4065/medical-expenses-2016.html#whtdcmnts

April 27, 2020
4:07 pm
Winnie
Ontario
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 473
Member Since:
December 7, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie said
It's not hard to rack up over 5K in medical expenses, especially if you have extended health insurance and/or travel health insurance and are a senior.  

Loonie, please correct me. As far as I understand, if insurance company covered (paid) for some medical expenses or parts, those expenses or parts paid by insurance company, can't be claimed as medical expenses. Only part that you paid from your own pocket can be claimed as medical expenses. Correct?

April 27, 2020
4:28 pm
pooreva
Member
Banned
Forum Posts: 440
Member Since:
April 2, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Winnie said
As far as I understand, if insurance company covered (paid) for some medical expenses or parts, those expenses or parts paid by insurance company, can't be claimed as medical expenses. Only part that you paid from your own pocket can be claimed as medical expenses. Correct?  

To my understanding, only out of pocket medical expanses can be claimed.
Meaning if you had dental/medical/drugs/glasses/etc. expenses of $3000 and claimed them with your private insurance and insurance paid you back $2100, you can claim only $900.
Some medical expenses are not covered by some insurance companies BUT are considered eligible expenses to CRA (requiring doctor's note) so those can be claimed too.
As for the audit, if they do it now it will be tough to get all receipts (unless you keep them all) as dentist, etc. are all closed so are not able to reprint them.
I guess you can provide printout from your insurance company showing what you claimed and what they paid back to you.

April 27, 2020
4:42 pm
BillieBob
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 163
Member Since:
November 6, 2018
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online

Bill said
BillieBob, re mileage log, etc, here's a link to CRA Guide RC4065, Medical Expenses (scroll up to top), it has a section on Travel Expenses and in that section there's another link to options re how to calculate travel expenses, etc. Maybe you already know.
https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/forms-publications/publications/rc4065/medical-expenses-2016.html#whtdcmnts  

Thanks Bill. I did use this same information to calculate my expenses.

No permission to create posts

Please write your comments in the forum.