Interest rates on GiCs education needed please. | General financial discussion | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Interest rates on GiCs education needed please.
February 7, 2017
6:36 pm
mmlt
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 168
Member Since:
February 4, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I'm having trouble understanding the interest rate terms of various gic offerings.
Wow! I see an advertised rate of 2.4 % over 3 years. When I read the details there's a bunch of double talk. It's not 2.4% per annum. It's 2.4 over the 3 year term.
What should I be looking for and how do I decipher the fine print? Sorry for my ignorance but I am confused by all the different terms.

February 7, 2017
6:43 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9384
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I look for when it is paid out and whether it is compounded annually.

I find Oaken's website to be one of the clearer ones in this regard, as an example. No "monkey business" there.
https://www.oaken.com/gic-rates/

February 7, 2017
6:51 pm
2of3aintbad
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 317
Member Since:
February 24, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

OP, do you have a link to this offer? I always thought that FIs were required to advertise the annual rate. I see that BMO advertises "up to 16% after 4 years" in their market linked product, but that is not so outrageous as saying 2.4% and meaning 0.8%

February 7, 2017
7:22 pm
mmlt
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 168
Member Since:
February 4, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I made up that example. I think the problem is my understanding. The interest rate should include per annum right? I have a paper in front of me from ValleyFirst for example.
They have a 15 month non-redeemable. Rate - 1.50%. It does not say per annum so I assume that is 1.5% interest over the 15 months. There are no other details. I think most of us think per annum and are the banks a little shady with how they portray their rates?

February 7, 2017
8:07 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7141
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ah yes: Is that rate "per term" or "per annum"? There was a lengthy ordeal about that in the thread Something to be aware of with "odd-month" GICs.

Usually rates of fixed income instruments are quoted as a per annum rate. That's even true for short term instruments like 90-day Government of Canada treasury bills and 30-day banker's acceptances.

I've only seen per term rates used in marketing material for market-linked deposits.

That Valley First 1.50% 15-month non-redeemable term is likely 1½% per annum. This is from Valley First - Feel confident about your financial future about their 15 month non-redeemable term deposit:

Key Features & Benefits

• Low minimum deposit with no maximum
• Available as a registered product so you can tax shelter the interest you earn
• Interest rates are per annum and paid annually
• Deposits are 100% guaranteed by the Credit Union Deposit Insurance Corporation of British Columbia†

February 7, 2017
8:17 pm
mmlt
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 168
Member Since:
February 4, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Thanks for finding that. Info is pretty plain online for that particular offering.
Thanks for the forum link.

February 7, 2017
9:53 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9384
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There is similar confusion with the current Meridian offer of 2.2% for 18 months. With some effort, you can find online that this is an annual rate. My branch manager assures me it includes annual compounding.

I wish they'd all set up their rates charts like Oaken.

I find the term "paid annually" inadequate by itself, especially in regards to non-registered funds because it doesn't tell me whether the money is paid out to me or reinvested (compounded).

February 8, 2017
9:11 am
mmlt
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 168
Member Since:
February 4, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

You folk are great here. Thanks for your patience and knowledge.

Oaken looks good Loonie. Wished they offered better rates. One has to appreciate the lack of "double talk".

Please write your comments in the forum.