10:09 am
February 12, 2022
I'm confident that CDIC could cover my savings if my member institution failed. But I wonder how long it would take me to get reimbursed and how much of a hassle it would be. Does anyone have experience with this? Probably not, since CDIC says that the last failure of one of its members happened in 1996:
https://www.cdic.ca/about-us/our-history/history-of-failures/
10:27 am
October 21, 2013
10:54 am
April 6, 2013
One should not be relying on CDIC or any deposit insurer for timely availability of funds. That's not what their insurance is for.
Deposit insurance will provide recovery of the funds. Not necessarily funds on time as originally agreed.
Globe & Mail columnist Rob Carrick wrote about that during the near failure of Home Trust years ago: The case for not biting on Home Capital’s 3.1% GIC (March 25, 2017).
If one could accept that the five-year Oaken GIC, with interest compounded until maturity, would pay out principal and interest late in five years time, then one should go for it. The Oaken GIC rates were market leading.
However, one should not go for any of the Oaken GIC's at that time if one needed the interest to be paid out monthly on time to cover monthly living expenses.
11:20 am
March 15, 2019
11:23 am
April 14, 2021
11:33 am
October 21, 2013
That's a good point about people who may be relying on regular income from GICs.
For those of us who aren't, not really an issue. I got 3.5% from Oaken for five years when they were considered risky, well above going rates, which was very helpful during the last few years of very low rates.
Here is what CDIC has to say about payout timing:
"CDIC’s goal is to reimburse funds from chequing and savings accounts, joint accounts and mortgage tax accounts to depositors within three business days of the date of failure.
The international standard (PDF, 821 KB) for reimbursement, established by the Financial Stability Board, is seven days."
This commitment does not appear to extend to GICs.
However, i would think that the GICs would be automatically void and the funds would be attributed to savings or chequing up on failure of the FI. I suppose it could take a little bit of time for that process to take place, but then they should be paid out quickly. What do others think?
I can't seem to find the direct link to that page but it came up when I googled "cdic when will it pay out" and it is a cdic page.
12:20 pm
April 6, 2013
Loonie said
…Here is what CDIC has to say about payout timing:
"CDIC’s goal is to reimburse funds from chequing and savings accounts, joint accounts and mortgage tax accounts to depositors within three business days of the date of failure. …
Those are goals and not commitments.
It could take longer than a week if the account records were tampered with and CDIC needs to look into claims of incorrect amounts of deposit.
12:34 pm
October 21, 2013
Yes, it's a goal. I realize that. But it does refer to an international standard, which I didn't know existed, and it's a heck of a lot faster than what my dad experienced. I think the standard did not exist then.
It's a good reminder though to keep up to date with saving your statements and transaction details. Statements may never be completely up to date but better than nothing.
Here''s the link to the international standards if anyone wants to read it:
https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/r_141015.pdf
What it says, more specifically, is:
"General resolution powers
3.2 Resolution authorities should have at their disposal a broad range of resolution powers, which should include powers to do the following: ...
(xii) Effect the closure and orderly wind-down (liquidation) of the whole or part of a failing firm with timely payout or transfer of insured deposits and prompt (for example, within seven days) access to transaction accounts and to segregated client funds)."
Not exactly an airtight guarantee but could be worse.
3:55 pm
October 27, 2013
Loonie said
This commitment does not appear to extend to GICs.
However, i would think that the GICs would be automatically void and the funds would be attributed to savings or chequing up on failure of the FI. I suppose it could take a little bit of time for that process to take place, but then they should be paid out quickly. What do others think?
CDIC usually sells 'the book' to another institution perhaps at 90 cents on the dollar or whatever market currently is relative to the 'book of GICs'. That could mean all the GICs are sold to another FI that puts their letterhead on the GIC. The fine print on that GIC you bought probably has a successors and assigns clause to permit that.
To answer the OP, I had GICs with Principal Trust in AB back in the early '80s. Principal Trust went teats up and a month or two later I got a letter from another FI that said they had taken over the obligations under the same terms and conditions, including term and maturity. Principal Trust is listed under the CDIC link for 'failures'.
3:57 pm
April 6, 2013
A lot has improved since the 1990's.
Under the CDIC Data and System Requirements By-law, CDIC members are now required to have capability to provide insured deposit information within six hours of a request from CDIC.
It is a good idea to keep statements and other evidence of deposit balances. An affidavit from the depositor that there was $50,000 in his HISA isn't going to be enough when the financial institution data extract only shows $500.
4:24 pm
January 28, 2015
4:27 pm
October 21, 2013
AltaRed said
CDIC usually sells 'the book' to another institution perhaps at 90 cents on the dollar or whatever market currently is relative to the 'book of GICs'. That could mean all the GICs are sold to another FI that puts their letterhead on the GIC. The fine print on that GIC you bought probably has a successors and assigns clause to permit that.
To answer the OP, I had GICs with Principal Trust in AB back in the early '80s. Principal Trust went teats up and a month or two later I got a letter from another FI that said they had taken over the obligations under the same terms and conditions, including term and maturity. Principal Trust is listed under the CDIC link for 'failures'.
While it is true that CDIC can arrange for a sinking FI's life to come to an end by arranging for its business to be absorbed by another FI, sometimes there are no takers and it really does fail completely. I think that is what the OP was inquiring about. It was that circumstance in which my dad got his money in the form of a cheque from CDIC. The arrangement for registered funds would probably be a bit different, not a cheque, probably a form telling you your balance and asking you where you want it transferred to.
4:36 pm
March 15, 2019
Years ago I saw a mutual fund that specialized in buying distressed debts and noticed they were holding some Russian bonds. Not sure what eventually became of those bonds. You pay your money and take your chances.
https://www.independent.co.uk/money/eighty-years-later-the-tsarist-bond-pays-off-1283278.html
4:40 pm
March 15, 2019
Another lesson from history.
https://archive.macleans.ca/article/1983/6/13/the-fall-of-a-financial-empire
7:42 pm
October 7, 2018
My memory is a little shaky, but as I recall, I had Canada Savings bonds at 19.5% around 1982 come due and bought a gic at Greymac Trust for $20,000 at around 17%. CDIC was maxed at 20,000. Greymac went under and I received my funds plus full interest on the due date after the failure. It was all covered and CDIC was increased to 60,000 in the midst of that failure. I transferred from Greymac to a gic at RBC and there was a delay in that transfer of about 15 days. Somehow I ended up making interest at both for that 15 days. So all worked out, but it was a nail biter. I probably would have lost the interest if CDIC wasn’t increased.
7:34 am
April 6, 2013
CDIC has also been involved when it didn't issue any cheques directly to depositors. Instead, CDIC can write a big cheque to another financial institution in return for assuming the liability for the deposits of the failing CDIC member.
That was the case in the failure of Central Guaranty Trust in 1992 when TD Bank assumed the Central Guaranty Trust deposits.
According to page 32 of CDIC's 2021 annual report, Adelaide Capital Corporation was formed to hold the remnants of Central Guaranty Trust for CDIC to try to recover the funds CDIC had to give to TD:
The [Canadian Deposit Insurance] Corporation’s consolidated financial statements include the results of Adelaide Capital Corporation (ACC), a structured entity created by CDIC in 1992 to effect the failure of Central Guaranty Trust Company and Central Guaranty Mortgage Corporation. …
So, decades later, CDIC still has not recovered all that money and ACC is still around.
7:39 am
November 8, 2018
9:00 am
October 27, 2013
I recognize this is first and foremost a 'HISA and GIC' investing site, and this is way off tangent to this thread, but to continue off tangent for a moment for those early (earlier) in their investing journeys........
With a diversified portfolio and time in the market, it is almost inconceivable to have ever lost in the stock market. The trend line of the MSCI World Index is to the northeast. Sure there are individual years when the stock market is down (recessions), and individual countries like Japan which have struggled for long periods, but over time, diversified stock market investing is like cutting grass. Some years produce better crops than others but most years there is grass to cut (profits that can be taken).
New products developed in the past 5 years make this super simple for retail investors. Invest in just one (or a few if one likes) of the Asset Allocation ETFs from Vanguard, Blackrock, or even BMO and go on about one's life. It is all one needs until they go out boots first.
This link is focused on Vanguard but this site https://www.canadianportfoliomanagerblog.com/how-to-choose-your-asset-allocation-etf/ is one of the very best to examine anything one can think of on Asset Allocation ETFS. Justin Bender and his cohorts perform an admirable public service above and beyond their primary portfolio management business. More information here https://www.canadianportfoliomanagerblog.com/category/etfs/asset-allocation-etfs/
10:39 am
October 27, 2013
I hate it when ability to edit disappears so quickly. .... Oh well!
I wanted to add to my post that I recognize equity market investing is not for everyone and the volatility may not serve the young who are saving for down payments, and it may not serve our more risk adverse elderly seniors who are scared to death of any volatility. GIC ladders will /can serve them well enough to get by.
Please write your comments in the forum.