Dealing with bank branches in your home province | General financial discussion | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Dealing with bank branches in your home province
July 12, 2019
8:30 am
Doug
British Columbia, Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4274
Member Since:
December 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

This thread was split off from a discussion about EQ Bank

Loonie, I know you've got a thing with using a financial institution that has a traditional bank branch in your home province out of the belief, which, as you know, I believe, is likely mistaken, that it will lead to better dealings for your executor. Most, if not all, financial institutions that are federally regulated do not require probate by the province in which the domiciled branch is located. Yes, it might mean an initial airplane trip for your executor to a nearby province to set up the deceased or estate account properly, provide copies of the will and death certificate and establish a relationship, but that's typically it. The rest can usually be done, in writing, via signed letters of direction.

Cheers,
Doug

July 12, 2019
1:05 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9384
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

An airplane trip for the executor is exactly what I'm trying to avoid! - who may be quite elderly and not qualify for travel health insurance by then.

July 12, 2019
1:45 pm
Doug
British Columbia, Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4274
Member Since:
December 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

An airplane trip for the executor is exactly what I'm trying to avoid! - who may be quite elderly and not qualify for travel health insurance by then.

Is your executor(trix) from the United States? The equality principles of Canada's universal public health care mean travel health insurance is unnecessary for Canadian residents. If your executor(trix) is from the U.S., I might suggest a Canadian-residing executor(trix) as I've read that estate administrators from outside the country can be problematic, perhaps more problematic than the branch of a domiciled bank account.

Cheers,
Doug

July 12, 2019
1:59 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9384
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Doug, provinces will not normally pay the full bill for each other's health care for travellers. They only pay a small portion. The only exception was (and may still be) for residents of Nunavut. Personally, I've never met anyone who was keen to move there.

Every once in a while they talk about having a meeting to talk about this, but it never goes anywhere because it will cost them all money.
I urge everyone to complain to their MP and MLA/MPP.

July 13, 2019
6:04 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7142
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

There are interprovincal billing agreements between most of the provinces for medically necessary hospital services and physician services. But, it doesn't cover non-hospital and non-physical services like ambulance.

Quebec didn't sign the agreements and also pays lower rates for services. Hospitals and doctors in other provinces have learned from experience that they will be shortchanged by the Quebec health plan. Consequently, they will ask Quebec patients to pay upfront.

July 13, 2019
7:51 am
Doug
British Columbia, Canada
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4274
Member Since:
December 12, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie said
Doug, provinces will not normally pay the full bill for each other's health care for travellers. They only pay a small portion. The only exception was (and may still be) for residents of Nunavut. Personally, I've never met anyone who was keen to move there.

Every once in a while they talk about having a meeting to talk about this, but it never goes anywhere because it will cost them all money.
I urge everyone to complain to their MP and MLA/MPP.  

Norman1 said
There are interprovincal billing agreements between most of the provinces for medically necessary hospital services and physician services. But, it doesn't cover non-hospital and non-physical services like ambulance.

Quebec didn't sign the agreements and also pays lower rates for services. Hospitals and doctors in other provinces have learned from experience that they will be shortchanged by the Quebec health plan. Consequently, they will ask Quebec patients to pay upfront.  

I assume it would still cover a visit to a walk-in clinic, particularly if said doctor's office codes it as "medically necessary" in terms of preventative medicine.

Most ambulance trips aren't fully covered in one's home province, as you do pay a small co-payment representing usually 5-10% of the total cost of the ambulance trip. I'm not sure whether you'd be liable for the full cost of the ambulance trip - I suspect not - the universality provisions of the Canada Health Act would seem to require that province B submits bill for that portion covered to its provincial residents to province A of the touring Canadian resident. Sure, the touring Canadian resident may be liable for a larger co-pay if province B has a higher co-payment, but that's not especially significant.

At any rate, Loonie, I've never heard of Canadians buying travel medical insurance in-country. Certainly, out of country, but never domestically. This seems like an unnecessary expense! Even if one were liable for full ~$1100 cost of ambulance travel out of home province, this would be an eligible expense they could charge to your Estate as your Executor(trix).

Cheers,
Doug

July 13, 2019
3:40 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9384
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I suggest anyone who is travelling out of province discuss this with a licensed insurance agent, for their own protection.

July 13, 2019
4:44 pm
rodeworthy
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 196
Member Since:
February 1, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

As a frequent long-term traveller outside Ontario I buy annual Travel Emergency Medical Insurance for trips to USA. The trips have been in the 4-6 month range.

As an add-on to this insurance, I buy Separate Annual Coverage for shorter trips throughout the year including to parts of Canada outside Ontario. Ontario Provincial Health reimbursement is limited for other parts of Canada, and totally eliminated as of this year for out-of-country medical expenses. Previously, OHIP would reimburse $200-$400 per day depending on the services required. Losing that has made the insurance more expensive. But I don't leave the province without it. Have never needed to use it. That's the good news.

Your provincial mileage may vary.

https://www.ontario.ca/page/ohip-coverage-across-canada

July 13, 2019
9:29 pm
Loonie
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 9384
Member Since:
October 21, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

You may have persuaded me to do without travel health insurance domestically, although it isn't as good as having it.

I have read in the past of significant disparities in rates for the same item in different provinces, not just Quebec. If, for example, you are hospitalized in BC and the daily rate for a ward room happens to be $200/day more than in your home province, is your home province going to pay the full rate? I just can't see that happening. Either the province where the incident happened has to agree to take less or the home province has to agree to pay more. Does anyone have any experience with this?

However, interprovincial travel isn't the only issue I am concerned about in relation to out-of-province FIs,
In the case of those that are provincially regulated, rules could change that we would not be aware of, especially in regards to POAs and wills.

In general, I am much more comfortable with FIs where I can talk to someone, preferably in person, locally.
Nobody has to agree with me, and I don't completely rule out out-of-province FIs. However, if you can get what you need at home, why go elsewhere?
I am tempted by Motive's Savvy Savings at the moment, as a replacement to Tangerine., especially for joint account. But I imagine that as soon as we move our money there, the rate will fall!sf-cry

July 14, 2019
9:06 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7142
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie said

In the case of those that are provincially regulated, rules could change that we would not be aware of, especially in regards to POAs and wills.

It doesn't matter if the financial institution is federally or provincially regulated. Probate and property are provincial jurisdiction and not federal. So, the deposit is always subject to provincial probate and POA requirements.

I found earlier that Bank Act subsection 461(4) and Trust and Loan Companies Act subsection 447(4) explicitly states that a deposit in a federally regulated bank or trust company is situated where the branch of deposit is.

It is a risk management decision for the financial institution whether or not to require a will probated in another province to be resealed in the province of the deposit. It depends on how much money is involved and how likely it is for a different will to be later successfully probated in the province of the deposit.

July 14, 2019
9:28 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7142
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Doug said

… I'm not sure whether you'd be liable for the full cost of the ambulance trip - I suspect not - the universality provisions of the Canada Health Act would seem to require that province B submits bill for that portion covered to its provincial residents to province A of the touring Canadian resident. Sure, the touring Canadian resident may be liable for a larger co-pay if province B has a higher co-payment, but that's not especially significant.

It is highly likely you would be liable for the full cost of the ambulance trip and for the cost of the accompanying fire truck.

Universality in section 10 of the Canada Health Act only deals with the persons eligible to be covered by a provincial plan, not the comprehensiveness of the coverage:

Universality

10 In order to satisfy the criterion respecting universality, the health care insurance plan of a province must entitle one hundred per cent of the insured persons of the province to the insured health services provided for by the plan on uniform terms and conditions.

Comprehensiveness is addressed in section 9 and is limited to the "insured health services" as defined in section 2 of the Canada Health Act and not as defined by any of the provincial plans. Ambulances and fire trucks are not included:

Definitions

2 In this Act,

insured health services means hospital services, physician services and surgical-dental services provided to insured persons, but does not include any health services that a person is entitled to and eligible for under any other Act of Parliament or under any Act of the legislature of a province that relates to workers’ or workmen’s compensation; 

Comprehensiveness

9 In order to satisfy the criterion respecting comprehensiveness, the health care insurance plan of a province must insure all insured health services provided by hospitals, medical practitioners or dentists, and where the law of the province so permits, similar or additional services rendered by other health care practitioners.

The portability in section 11 does not require a provincial plan to provide coverage for medically necessary but non-emergency out-of-province services:

Requirement for consent for elective insured health services permitted

11 (2) The criterion respecting portability is not contravened by a requirement of a provincial health care insurance plan that the prior consent of the public authority that administers and operates the plan must be obtained for elective insured health services provided to a resident of the province while temporarily absent from the province if the services in question were available on a substantially similar basis in the province.

Definition of elective insured health services

(3) For the purpose of subsection (2), elective insured health services means insured health services other than services that are provided in an emergency or in any other circumstance in which medical care is required without delay.

July 14, 2019
10:41 am
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7142
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Loonie said

I have read in the past of significant disparities in rates for the same item in different provinces, not just Quebec. If, for example, you are hospitalized in BC and the daily rate for a ward room happens to be $200/day more than in your home province, is your home province going to pay the full rate? I just can't see that happening. Either the province where the incident happened has to agree to take less or the home province has to agree to pay more. Does anyone have any experience with this?

From the inter provincial schedules in the Ontario health plan, it looks like the involved provinces agreed on a specific rate for each individual Ontario hospital.

Please write your comments in the forum.