9:55 pm
October 21, 2013
There was a programme this evening on CNN about Bitcoin. It explained it as well as anything I've seen, but I still find it difficult to really understand and assess. http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/18/.....index.html
Does anyone have an experience with it? What do you think about its viability etc.? Is it a way of avoiding the problems associated with US and Cdn currency, being vulnerable to devaluation due to being tied to national economic bases, money-printing, debt etc.? I realize its use is still limited, but that could change. There seem to be regulatory problems. What is being done to introduce accountability?
Does it have competitors?
Let's discuss it!
12:52 pm
July 10, 2011
I have a good chunk of experience with it.. I've yet to watch Spurlock's show but seems to be re-igniting some interest slowly.. In terms of the technology/code behind Bitcoin I don't think alot of the problems are here.. It should be sound.. However.. The problems erghh the problems.. For the average individual bitcoin is not for you.. It requires a level of technical prowess in order to utilize/store/invest in safely.. It requires due-dilligence far beyond what would be typical of a stock or investment product.. In fact take the higest risk stock or product you own times it by a thousand and this is still below bitcoin risk threshold.
It is an interesting idea but frought with risks. In terms of Loonie's quetions.. Is it viable in my opinion yes.. Is it away to avoid pain and suffering with the US/CDN devaluation i would say yes.. Regulatory varies by country but is apart of vast due dilligence.. Competitors yes and no.. the RCM has a "digital" currency.. There are others out there not using BTC code or platform..
If your willing to travel into the investment wild-west then take a look at bitcoin however you can and very well might lose anything in it.. Don't be swayed by big media (or names) stories on Bitcoin.. Winklevoss bros etc..
Alot of early investors have made their $$.. It concerns me where the concentrations of BTC are occuring now.. If BTC stays flat I could see US and Canada taking a swing to stamp it out.. Mintchip has been in use for awhile now as a limited pilot.. With OLG now coming online as well as more govt services it wouldn't surprise me to see mintchip and others getting some new funding or attention..
9:55 pm
April 6, 2013
Bitcoins are a electronic system of transferable vouchers similar to Canadian Tire money and shopping mall gift certificates.
Viability depends on the viability of Bitcoin exchanges, where one can exchange bitcoins for traditional currency, like Canadian dollars or Euros.
I don't think they can be used to avoid US$ or CDN$ issues. Bitcoins' value depends on how much US$ or CDN$ one can exchange them for. Otherwise, they have as much value as Monopoly money. After all, the Passport Office doesn't accept bitcoins for passport fees. CRA doesn't accept bitcoins as payment towards taxes. Provincial hydros don't accept them for electricity bill payments. Municipalities don't accept them for property taxes or development charges. Hospitals don't accept them either for medical services.
12:20 pm
September 11, 2013
I think many people today have been taught that banking and financial system, democratically elected governments, capitalist system, etc are greedy and evil, so as an act of self-righteousness, "I'm not participating in this because I am virtuous", freely exchange their dollars (i.e. the one, sovereign legal tender backed by the democratic governments of Canada and United States) for something someone invented called Bitcoin (redeemable and backed by what or who or where exactly.......??) O-K. How about everybody send me their dollars in exchange for BillCoins, issued and backed by me?
1:00 pm
January 30, 2009
1:16 pm
April 6, 2013
Self-righteousness is a possibility. Another is just plain greed.
The accounts from some people who lost money in the collapse of the Mt. Gox Bitcoin exchange sound like they were speculating in bitcoins much the same way people were speculating in tulip bulbs during the Dutch tulip bulb bubble in the 1630's. These are some of the stories from BitcoinTalk.org: Mt.Gox Multi-plaintiff Suit:
My name is xxxxxx and I am from California (if that matters). I have about 650 BTC in Gox. I haven't slept in days and haven't been able to tell my wife how much I've lost. I was an early adopter, just mining in my basement, and I can't imagine all of my time and work vanishing like this. Please contact me with what I need to do
I would like to join your action lawsui as co-paintiff. I try to keep this short since you are probably getting tons of PMs.
I'm resident of Germany and I'm waiting for ~5700 Euros (~7800 US$) to be withdrawn by MTGOX. I also have about 9 BTCs on my account there. I successfully received a MTGOX-withdrawal of 990 EUR on 2013/12/30, which was ordered on 2013/12/03.
I'm a student and this is almost all of my money I have left (I actually have a lot of debt, which I intended to pay back with that money). I'm really panicking right now and not sure what to do!!!
I found your post just today after the Gox closed the site. I had 10,200 USD with them, which I traded just last week for gox coin. I initially deposited USD from bank account on November 2013, and traded on Gox just about 2 weeks ago, not knowing there was a trouble to withdraw any BTC from them. I do have screen shots from last week from trading and all my history since November 2013. My initial deposits in November have been 8000 USD and 2200 USD, so whatever trading I did in last weeks was for vain since gox did not let any BTC out of the site. Current standing on my account is about 27 BTC and around 2200 USD but since gox coin was never a real BTC, as I just learnt recently, I consider Gox owing me 10200 USD which I initially deposited.
Otherwise, I find it hard to believe someone would spend (and risk) £200,000 on Bitcoins as described by Daily Mail Online: 'Where's our money?'.
1:23 pm
August 9, 2014
I think people trust bitcoin is because it have a maximum amount of coin that are allow to be issue which is build intrinsically into the system. As a result, "miner", or people with supercomputer that solve equations from the bitcoin network to receive reward in bitcoin will face a increasingly more difficult equation.
But I have to say, one of the important feature of currency is the measurement of value, but if it is so volatile (which is what happen not long ago), it will not be able to do this job.
8:31 pm
April 6, 2013
Perhaps bitcoins are just another payment method (like MasterCard and Visa) and not really a currency.
This excerpt from the MONEY Magazine article No, Big Companies Aren’t Really Accepting Bitcoin cuts through some of the bitcoin promo nonsense and sheds light on what companies that accept bitcoins really do with them:
...
BitPay, which has partnered with Microsoft, Newegg, and other merchants, confirmed to MONEY that the majority of its major clients ask that their bitcoins be instantly converted to cash. “I would say as a general trend most of our larger business do choose a settlement in 100% U.S. dollars because that’s how they do their accounting and finance,” said Tony Gallippi, co-founder and executive chairman of BitPay.That’s a rather charitable explanation of why companies take fiat over bitcoin when given the choice. In reality, it’s probably because they simply don’t trust bitcoin as a stable store of value. Since Dell began accepting bitcoin through Coinbase in July 2014, bitcoin’s value has dropped by over 54 percent. If Dell had actually kept the cryptocurrency it received, its revenue from bitcoin sales would have essentially been cut in half.
...
2:45 am
October 21, 2013
Interesting piece by John Lanchester on the nature of money and bitcoin in particular. It's long, but some will find it worth their while.
I am a fan of Lanchester's books and find him more useful than much of what usually passes for "financial literacy" reading.
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n08/j.....n-grows-up
5:02 pm
April 6, 2013
Loonie said
Interesting piece by John Lanchester on the nature of money and bitcoin in particular. It's long, but some will find it worth their while.
I am a fan of Lanchester's books and find him more useful than much of what usually passes for "financial literacy" reading.When Bitcoin Grows Up by John Lanchester
Interesting article. Lots of details and history about money and bitcoin. Unfortunately, it is flawed as the result of these two erroneous statements:
- Its [money's] value rests on our belief in its value, underwritten by the authority of the state.
- It doesn’t alter the fact that bitcoin has done very well for a form of money only seven years old, with no entity backing it other than lines of code running on a network of computers.
Regarding #1, most people don't really give a thought about whether or not money is sanctioned or underwritten by the state. In practice, it doesn't really matter.
What does matter is whether or not the money can be exchanged for things people need or satisfy obligations, particularly taxes. If the grocery store, telephone company, landlord, and CRA were to accept Canadian Tire money as payment, then people would be perfectly happy to be paid in Canadian Tire money than Canadian dollars. Otherwise, people will not accept Canadian Tire money, regardless of its security features.
#2 is simply false. Bitcoins have value because of the exchanges where one can convert the bitcoins into so-called fiat currency. Without the exchanges, bitcoins are just digital Monopoly money.
On the west coast, there is a non-digital alternate currency called Salt Spring Dollars that circulates mainly on Salt Spring Island and is not as hyped as bitcoins. See http://www.saltspringcoin.com/.
Merchants there accept them because they are backed by Salt Spring Island Monetary Foundation which will exchange each Salt Spring Dollar for a Canadian dollar.
8:46 pm
October 21, 2013
I think Lanchester's emphasis in the above clips was meant to be on the fact that we take our currency on faith, not on gold or any other commodity (not that we have any choice!). I don't think he would deny that the proof is in the pudding - i.e. on whether you can pay your grocery bill with it - or that most people are not concerned about this question.
I think he means to place bitcoin in that context. It too depends for its viability on our belief that we can ultimately transform it into goods and services.
As I understand it, bitcoiners believe that they will continue to be able to do this, and that their currency will appreciate. Otherwise, they would not participate. I think that's what he means when he says it has done very well so far.
So, I don't see that these statements are erroneous or that he and Norman have opposite views.
Toronto also had or perhaps still has an alternate currency called Toronto Dollars. Its use was restricted to a small area, and it was effectively a medium for barter as I understood it. It never really caught on in a significant way. But Salt Spring is full of alternative-minded folks!
6:40 am
June 29, 2013
I think the article is somewhat convoluted - it could have been written more concisely (and more precisely) as to what the writer was intending to convey to his readers. I studied economics at university and I found the article excessively wordy and not that clear in what he was trying to express. However, if Loonie thinks it was a great article, then so be it.
11:58 am
October 21, 2013
Alas, none of my 3 degrees are in economics. Like most of the population, I did not study economics at university. One of the things I liked about this article was that it was much more understandable than many other things I have tried to read - although I still faltered at some of the technical info.
The author is a novelist who also has a special interest and knowledge of banking due to his personal background, so he brings us something from both worlds. He also has a book entitled How to Speak Money, which I found very helpful. Brian would not be interested in it, I'm sure, as he would already understand these concepts, but for those of us less well schooled in economics, it provides a very valuable service, much better than the financial literacy (so-called) sources I have seen.
12:26 pm
April 6, 2013
Loonie said
Toronto also had or perhaps still has an alternate currency called Toronto Dollars. Its use was restricted to a small area, and it was effectively a medium for barter as I understood it. It never really caught on in a significant way. But Salt Spring is full of alternative-minded folks!
Toronto Dollars are gone.
According to the Wikipedia article, the "Toronto Dollar organization has had to suspend sales of Toronto Dollars due to lack of volunteers and the lack of infrastructure to support the work."
However, I suspect that the real reason was that people had to pay $1 for each Toronto Dollar. But, the merchants who had accepted them could only redeem each Toronto Dollar for 90¢.
For the merchants, it would have been like offering a storewide 10% discount. As well, if merchants are complaining about the 2% to 3% commission rate on credit cards, then they will not be welcoming to a payment method with a 10% commission rate.
12:44 pm
April 6, 2013
Loonie said
I think Lanchester's emphasis in the above clips was meant to be on the fact that we take our currency on faith, not on gold or any other commodity (not that we have any choice!). I don't think he would deny that the proof is in the pudding - i.e. on whether you can pay your grocery bill with it - or that most people are not concerned about this question.
I think he means to place bitcoin in that context. It too depends for its viability on our belief that we can ultimately transform it into goods and services.
…
I think that is where Lanchester and I diverge. Lanchester's position is that both fiat currencies and bitcoin depend solely on faith. I don't think that's really the case.
Bitcoins may depend solely on faith. But, Canadian dollars are widely accepted because the Canadian governments will accept unlimited amounts of them for payments, particularly for income taxes, property taxes, passport fees, municipal development charges, water charges, and electricity charges.
I don't think much faith is needed to believe that Canadian governments will accept Canadian dollars as payment for as long as they will be around. That's probably about the same lack of faith needed to believe that we will be paying taxes until the end of time.
In contrast, I'm not sure the bitcoin exchanges actually have the US$9 billion to redeem all the bitcoins at their current value.
7:35 pm
October 21, 2013
You might be right, Norman.
On the other hand, one's Cdn dollars (or any other nation's currency) can be devalued, somewhat or a lot, by government itself or by what it will buy from other countries. There are many examples of this in various parts of the world, as I'm sure you know.
Rates can go up, a lot or a little. If our dollar is devalued, our rates go up, so the dollar you had yesterday is not worth as much as the dollar you have tomorrow, even though the government still stands behind it. And the government does not sell groceries or sell housing normally.
You may have more confidence in the Cdn dollar than I do (or not). And that is what Lanchester is on about, I think, that different people have different levels of confidence in different currencies.
The value is in what it will get you when you need to exchange it. Bitcoin, I expect, is less reliable, but over the longer term who knows?
1:38 pm
June 29, 2013
Loonie - you might want to rethink your enthusiasm for Bitcoin over CAD - see CNN Money article today.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/0.....index.html
Bitcoin owners targeted by hackers last week may lose about 36% of their money.
Hong Kong-based Bitfinex said it's working to reopen the exchange by Monday. The platform was shut down on August 3 after 119,756 bitcoins, worth more than $65 million based on exchange rates at the time, were stolen from some users' accounts.
Bitfinex said it decided "after much thought, analysis and consultations" to generalize the losses across all users. That means even people who weren't affected by the hack will find that 36% of the value of their accounts will be replaced by a "token" labeled BFX.
The company said it will use those tokens to keep track of customers' losses and will work to compensate the accounts in the future. Bitfinex said those discussions are "in early stages" and "will likely take time to play out."
"The BFX tokens will remain outstanding until redeemed in full by Bitfinex or possibly exchanged" for shares of Bitfinex's owner, iFinex Inc., the company said in a statement.
CNNMoney (New York)
First published August 7, 2016: 1:50 PM ET
5:45 pm
October 21, 2013
3:48 pm
December 23, 2011
Bitcoin flawed...... http://baystreet.ca/articles/t.....spx?id=686
Please write your comments in the forum.