BC goes after "unexplained wealth". | Page 2 | General financial discussion | Discussion forum

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
sp_Search Search
Advanced Search
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Search Search
Go to Bottom
No permission to create posts
Page: 12Jump to page
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
BC goes after "unexplained wealth".
December 17, 2023
1:58 pm
RetirEd
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 1175
Member Since:
November 18, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
Go to Top
21sp_Permalink sp_Print

Norman1: I am not disputing that there are and have been proceedings for civil forfeiture. I'm saying I consider it a violation of legal principles.

I am unsure of whether the link you posted refers to how cases are initiated or defended. I had an extensive discussion about this with a prominent lawyer I know a few years back, and I'm not aware of legislative changes since.

Another question is where in the process defense can take place. I can't find a certain answer. Or what evidence is sufficient to trigger an order.

RetirEd

December 17, 2023
9:05 pm
Norman1
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 7205
Member Since:
April 6, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
Go to Top
22sp_EditHistory sp_Permalink sp_Print

Yes, BC: Civil forfeiture and associated pages describe how the cases are started and defended.

The cases can go through three stages if defendant disputes the action:

  1. Notice of possessory interest
  2. Administrative forfeiture
  3. Civil forfeiture proceedings in the Supreme Court of British Columbia

Defendant has opportunity to dispute the action at all three stages.

No permission to create posts
Page: 12Jump to page
sp_Feed All RSS
Go to top

Please write your comments in the forum.