10:11 am
October 21, 2013
10:43 am
October 27, 2013
Only EQ knows why it prefers one channel or another. One advantage is there certainly is less administrative work involved (no need for CSRs, folks answering phones, etc.).
Perhaps the larger institutions like the broker channel better given most of the broker ISAs (all big 6 banks anyway and maybe even the lifecos) are now paying 2.25% or thereabouts.
11:37 am
April 6, 2013
Equitable Bank prefers to have access to multiple deposit channels for diversification.
Each channel gathers funds from different depositors with different competition.
An ISA paying 1.65% isn't going to work in the advisor channel. The advisor can easily enter DYN6000, instead of EQB1000, to place the funds into a Scotiabank ISA that pays 2¼% right now.
1:45 pm
October 21, 2013
I hear what you're saying, Norman, but, still, it seems thin if that's all there is to it.
There is competition in alternative banks/CUs well above 1.65% just as there is competition in an investment account. I assume people who go to the bother to seek out EQ Bank can equally be lured elsewhere (rate being almost twice as high at Motive or Oaken, for example) although the competition would be more temptingly easy to migrate to at a brokerage.
I think I'd be very cheesed off with EQ if I found out they were offering more through another channel, or, worse, that I could do much better at Motive. I have money in none of these at the moment; I chose DUCA, currently at 3.25%.
8:44 am
April 6, 2013
If Equitable Bank has what they need and more paying 1.65% for EQ Bank savings account deposits, then it doesn't matter what other competitors are paying. They have no incentive to compete for more unneeded savings deposits.
Equitable Bank likely doesn't want more 3-month deposits either, with EQ Bank 3-month GIC's paying just 2% per annum! Alternatively, one could place funds in a Hubert one-year term deposit and cash out after three months to collect 4.1% per annum.
8:10 pm
October 21, 2013
If they don't need more cash at EQ in the range of 1.65%, then, to me at least, it doesn't make sense that they offer 2.25% at brokerages. I don't see that they need to be involved with the brokerages at all on that basis. Brokerage customers can get the same rate with a bank with a higher credit rating.
Mind you, both rates are uninspiring. Maybe they don't want new deposits through either route.
9:20 pm
April 6, 2013
Equitable Bank is offering 2.30% on their brokerage ISA, slightly more than the 2.25% from the Scotiabank, TD, and RBC ISA's.
That's right. Not wanting more savings deposits doesn't mean wanting to get rid of the existing savings deposits.
If Equitable Bank did wish to get rid of the existing savings deposits, they would lower the rate to something like 1%.
12:42 am
February 7, 2019
4:33 am
January 9, 2011
Re: EQ's HISA rates, another factor not to be forgotten is they offered preferential (at the time, but not now) 6 and 9 month GIC rates in the spring when there was little attraction elsewhere. Most of these funds are still existing, essentially trapping funds while EQ reaps the rewards of that strategy. I have one due Saturday and another in 4 weeks.
Another reason why they have no incentive to raise HISA rates until the outflow of those funds starts in earnest, which it will.
"Keep your stick on the ice. Remember, I'm pulling for you. We're all in this together." - Red Green
9:28 am
August 12, 2022
The Fed's Loretta Mester stated on Aug 31 that rates will need to rise "somewhat above 4%" by early 2023 and stay there all year. Canada will follow. That means HISA rates will be 4% or higher very soon. I say that because the BOC rate is now 2.5% and some FI's are offering 3% HISA's.
EQ is far behind the curve at 1.65%. I surmise they don't need the funds. I've moved out my entire 6 figure deposit to an FI paying 3%. I like the liquidity of a HISA and am not interesting in locking in funds as I believe cash is king in times like these.
The only drawback is the hassle of moving funds around but I understand that Canada is working on a real time payment system called RTR that will allow transfers of funds immediately and available 24/7/365. Coming in 2023.
9:56 am
January 13, 2022
evercareful said
EQ is far behind the curve at 1.65%. I surmise they don't need the funds. I've moved out my entire 6 figure deposit to an FI paying 3%. I like the liquidity of a HISA and am not interesting in locking in funds as I believe cash is king in times like these.
I appreciate the explanations about the logic behind EQ's rate choices. They use calculated moves that reflect their needs at a point in time. But there is an intangible here...and that's the reputational loss that they are experiencing as result of this ridiculous HISA rate, and also lowering GIC rates in comparison to other leading lenders. Just as evercareful has done, I and two family members have moved almost about 700K out of EQ over the past month or two. And frankly, they have lost much of the respect we've had for them. Certainly, we can't be the only ones who have lost faith in EQ as a result of 1.65 percent.
10:15 am
May 19, 2022
lifeonanisland said
evercareful said
EQ is far behind the curve at 1.65%. I surmise they don't need the funds. I've moved out my entire 6 figure deposit to an FI paying 3%. I like the liquidity of a HISA and am not interesting in locking in funds as I believe cash is king in times like these.I appreciate the explanations about the logic behind EQ's rate choices. They use calculated moves that reflect their needs at a point in time. But there is an intangible here...and that's the reputational loss that they are experiencing as result of this ridiculous HISA rate, and also lowering GIC rates in comparison to other leading lenders. Just as evercareful has done, I and two family members have moved almost about 700K out of EQ over the past month or two. And frankly, they have lost much of the respect we've had for them. Certainly, we can't be the only ones who have lost faith in EQ as a result of 1.65 percent.
Yup, same here; I agree with all that you said. I just last night finished clearing out every last cent from my EQ savings accounts and moved it all over to Motive. I do still have GIC's with EQ, but I just might be giving up on EQ altogether by next summer, unless they give me a reason not to. So sad that my favourite FI went from right near the top of the heap to near the bottom in very short order.
11:13 am
October 27, 2013
Like others, I have moved my HISA funds out of EQ Bank. However, I have simply moved them to the brokerage ISA channel. They have been very clever to have EQB1000 ISA in the brokerage channel. https://mrthrifty.ca/investment-savings-accounts-maximize-interest-in-your-brokerage-account/
Note Laurentian is doing the same with their B2B ISA (BTB100).
I have no anger pointed at EQ. They are doing what they need to do for their business and their financials.
9:36 pm
October 21, 2013
7:54 am
February 7, 2019
6:24 pm
March 21, 2022
Why does EQ keep advertising their low rate HISA of 1.65% on social media when their compétition is offering a sizable interest rate that EQ cannot or will not match? Why continue to waste advertising dollars? Increasing a low interest rate to competitive market rates will be more beneficial for EQ and they will retain their valuble customer base instead of seeing it disappear.
8:03 pm
October 21, 2013
8:12 pm
April 6, 2013
8:32 am
September 4, 2022
Someone was harping on Gic rates not going up because of lower loan growth. The evidence suggests otherwise.
"The numbers reflect trends seen across Canadian bank earnings for the quarter: continued loan growth as the overall economy, including the unemployment rate and GDP growth, remained strong." Ctv 08/30/22
9:03 am
October 27, 2013
Hellohello said
Someone was harping on Gic rates not going up because of lower loan growth. The evidence suggests otherwise."The numbers reflect trends seen across Canadian bank earnings for the quarter: continued loan growth as the overall economy, including the unemployment rate and GDP growth, remained strong." Ctv 08/30/22
1) That is 'ancient' history from the last quarter. Things have changed with BoC increases. The banks wouldn't also be increasing credit loss provisions if they thought they didn't have increased credit risk from loan defaults.
2) Loan growth in a broad sense is different from loan demand at a particular interest rate, or rate of loan growth. There can be a lot of loan demand growth at 5-6%, but negligible growth at 7-8%. Sticker shock and/or inability to qualify for a mortgage at 6%, but qualifying at 5%, makes a difference.
You are reading what you want into a sound bite without the proper context.
Please write your comments in the forum.