11:45 am
November 20, 2018
12:17 pm
February 17, 2013
Decent FI if everything goes smoothly. If you have issues, look forward to long wait times to talk to someone. Lack of RSP & TFSA is a concern. No ForEx or cheques. Everything is digital. Closest thing to a combined chequing(without cheques)/savings account as you can set up bill payments and direct deposits.
I'm ok with them, would not consider making them my main FI due to lack of above mentioned issues. Hoping that will change.
12:29 pm
November 8, 2018
Use EQ as a place to park money and pay bills electronically. Setting joint account is extremely easy.
For (almost) everything else, use your "other" bank, don't close account there. Link it with EQ for large money transfers, use Interac for small money transfers between your accounts.
For me, it is a combination of EQ for what I said above plus Tangerine for "everything else." Works for me. Just EQ wouldn't.
12:42 pm
October 27, 2013
1:46 pm
July 7, 2020
As I understand CDIC rules, the joint account option allows a couple to park $300K (if they have it of course 🙂 ) and be CDIC insured.
You would have $100K CDIC insurance in accounts held by (H), (W), and (H+W). If stinkin' rich 😉 could also have joint accounts for (H+F), (H+M), (W+F), and (W+M) each insured for $100K. I hope the initials are fairly self-explanatory.
It's nice to dream.
2:54 pm
October 27, 2013
6:47 am
May 27, 2016
Rick said
Still......long drop to the bottom of the HISA chart. Nice to have in your back pocket to cover a base if needed. It's all set up. won't close it and actually using it a bit. Â
And I wouldn't close it either, because you might have a hard time re-opening it if you ever wanted to. Unless things have changed recently, EQ Bank has always warned that closing your account would permanently "terminate your relationship" with them.
I've always thought it was kind of strange for a bank to have a scorched earth policy when it comes to customers, but there it is. Could just be a systems design flaw, I don't know, but you'd think that was a fixable problem if they actually wanted to fix it
5:32 pm
April 20, 2019
Would people feel safe putting more than 100k into an EQ bank HISA? How do people get around the 100k cdic insurance limits for deposits? Can I open 2 separate non registered savings accounts under my name and would that be insured? Presently they have the highest rate thats not a promo. With larger banks like tangerine i didn't care too much but moving my money out of there now. Any suggestions?
5:56 pm
July 7, 2020
This describes CDIC coverage, the site has other good info too: https://www.cdic.ca/your-coverage/how-deposit-insurance-works/
Bottom line, all your accounts at EQ are insured for a total of $100K. How do people get around that? Until recently, you couldn't at EQ. But some ways at other institutions (#1 is available at EQ now):
1. Open a joint account with someone else, that account will also be covered for $100K.
2. TFSA/RSP are covered separately (but EQ doesn't offer).
3. Some (e.g. Oaken, Peoples Group) have created 2 banks under one umbrella, technically separate institutions for CDIC purposes.
I wouldn't be too worried about having $100K at EQ, it's insured, though it could be inconvenient if you need the money at that time.
7:04 am
April 20, 2019
Thanks for your response ottawa. I didnt realize there was a post much earlier in the thread that touched on part of my question. My main concern was more regarding if u have, for example, 150k would u feel safe having it above the cdic limit with this FI? In the past i never had this issue(its a good problem to have). If i were to create a joint account for the extra 50k, who pays the T5 tax? The higher income individual come tax time? I assume they can only tax one person if its a joint account?? I have never had a joint account before. I am not married. I apologize if my questions are somewhat basic but i am learning slowly through the group. Much appreciated.
7:24 am
July 7, 2020
For joint accounts and T5, I believe in practice you can distribute the tax burden any way you want between the holders, as long as it adds up to 100% of the interest being taxed. 😉
Technically I think you're supposed to declare the interest in ratio to who put in the money, which works for you in this case but might not be true if the holders are at arms' length (e.g. you and your neighbour kick in money save up and buy a fence, you might pay a little more attention to who's declaring the interest).
Let's say we live in an alternate universe where they actually pay attention to distribution of the interest and audit you. If you open a joint account with your mother (don't even have to tell her the password :), and you put in $100K, by law you should be declaring 100% of the interest. The only way I could see you having trouble would be if your hypothetical mother-as-joint-account-holder pays 0% tax, you're in top bracket, and you try to declare the $2000 interest on her T1. That might not stand up to audit if you couldn't show where she got the $100K to put in the account, but again this is an extreme example and hypothetical at that (that's all just my layman's understanding -- I am not an accountant or tax lawyer).
I would not be comfortable going over CDIC limit without good reason. For example, I have a 2.8% offer with Simplii (ends Aug 30) so if I had >$100K I'd be tempted to put some of it into Simplii at 2.8% (uninsured past $100K) rather than EQ at 2.0% (insured). But I probably wouldn't because I'm cautious. 🙂 Even more now than in normal times, but even in normal times.
In your example, where you're only talking about 2.0% at EQ, I'd open an account at Motive for 2.05% (but perhaps less convenient, so park the extra there), or Peoples Trust/Bank for 1.8%. [I just looked and see Motive is now 1.75% so forget that, but point is I'd work my way down the list.] Including a Joint account, EQ will cover $200K, PT/PB will cover $400K, and so on.
Though I'm never quite clear on the joint rules for CDIC, I know a married couple could cover (H), (W), and (H+W) each for $100K, but would (H+M) also be covered for $100K or is it "I'm covered for all my joint accounts"? I think the former but don't really have to worry about it. Wish I had that problem. Wish we all had that problem. 😉
7:34 am
July 7, 2020
With larger banks like tangerine i didn't care too much but moving my money out of there now. Any suggestions?
Slight tangent, but my suggestion for Tangerine is always keep $2 at most there (I have $2 in chequing, $0 in saving, and about every 6 months I transfer $1 chequing-saving and then back, strictly to avoid the hassle of it going dormant, having to call, etc.).
The best way to use Tangerine is to keep your accounts empty, so when they offer a promotional rate on "Net New Deposits", you've only got $2 (in my case) earning regular rate. As soon as a promo expires, I clean it out. Hard to believe, but a couple of years ago they once gave my mother 3 promo rates in a row (and I got no offers during the same time). It wasn't totally clear but if you have > $10 earning 0.2% in Tangerine (I don't think you do, but it wasn't clear), GET IT OUT TODAY if not sooner! 🙂
7:50 am
September 11, 2013
If A&B have a joint account, and A&C have a joint account, A has separate CDIC coverage for each account, i.e. could have $100K in each.
T5s are issued with the SIN of the primary account holder, far as I know. If that person declares the interest CRA will never question it, their matching program is happy, even if the secondary owner of the account put all the money in and technically should be reporting the interest income. Though I have, sometimes, split it up and put in a note to CRA, with each return, explaining what's going on and why we're reporting it this way and they've never questioned that either. But I do have a sterling reputation (throughout our entire society) for honesty so maybe that's why CRA hasn't followed up.
8:59 am
April 6, 2013
ottawa said
…
Though I'm never quite clear on the joint rules for CDIC, I know a married couple could cover (H), (W), and (H+W) each for $100K, but would (H+M) also be covered for $100K or is it "I'm covered for all my joint accounts"? I think the former but don't really have to worry about it. Wish I had that problem. Wish we all had that problem. 😉
According to CDIC: Deposits held in more than one name, coverage is $100,000 per "set" of owners:
… Each eligible joint deposit is protected for up to $100,000 per set of joint owners, regardless of the number of people who own the deposit. So, for example, we would provide coverage of up to $100,000 in each of the following:
- your joint chequing account with an aging parent;
- your own personal savings account;
- your joint savings account with a spouse.
In your example, there are two sets of owners for the joint accounts. The family relationships don't matter:
- {H, W}
- {H, M}
8:59 am
July 7, 2020
Thanks, that's a good strategy for when I need to move my billions back onshore. 😉
But seriously thanks for clarifying CDIC rules, that's what I thought.
And I guess they do put only one SIN on a T5, though they have both names (don't think I've seen a T5 for an account with >2 names, though I've seen statements with 4 names). I guess if the primary doesn't declare 100% they check the other holders. I can't imagine it mattering except in an extreme case like my hypothetical above.
9:02 am
July 7, 2020
In your example, there are two sets of owners for the joint accounts. Any family relationships don't matter:
{H, W}
{H, M}
Thank you, so with both parents alive you could theoretically insure $100K with each of (H), (W), (H+W), (H+M), (H+F), (W+M), (W+F), (H+M+F), (W+M+F), and (H+W+M+F), assuming the institution allowed 3 and 4 names on an account (assuming the money really belonged to H+W). That's a million already, so not likely a concern for too many people.
9:41 am
September 11, 2013
10:14 am
October 27, 2013
I wouldn't open a joint account with anyone but my spouse. Any other person could end up walking with the funds, or run into credit problems and have the account seized to pay debts, or be subject to division in a marital separation/divorce. It simply is not worth it when there are other digital banks around.
This issue has been raised before in other forums and so many pooh-pooh the risk due to perceived trustworthiness of the co-owner, especially if a family member. Good luck with that! A good number of family members who are the most likely to get into financial trouble are also the ones more likely to stiff their own family for the account money.
Please write your comments in the forum.