12:39 pm
December 12, 2009
Canadian Tire Corporation has announced yesterday, the sale of a 20% equity stake in its Canadian Tire Financial Services Ltd arm, which is that division that wholly owns the Canadian Tire Bank Schedule I Chartered Bank subsidiary that offers GICs and non-registered/registered (TFSA only) high-interest savings accounts, to be effective on or before Sept. 30th, 2014, to The Bank of Nova Scotia (Scotiabank). That's happening rather quickly, actually, perhaps more quickly than I'd anticipated.
As one of their stated goals was to reduce the funding liability, and thereby the capital they're required to hold on their balance sheet that can be used in more shareholder-friendly ways (i.e., stock buybacks, dividend increases and possibly retail acquisitions), Canadian Tire has also struck an agreement with Scotiabank to fund a minimum of $2.25 billion in credit card receivables. Presumably, that will be "off balance sheet," either through Scotia's own credit card receivables trust or through its own deposit operations. Either way, considering that's almost exactly half CTFS' existing outstanding credit card receivables of approximately $4.4 billion, that either funds all of their future credit card growth and/or allows them reduce the credit card receivables within its own Glacier Credit Card Trust. It also, in my view, reduces the importance on its own direct-to-consumer and deposit broker-channeled GIC & HISA operations of Canadian Tire Bank such that I still see them lowering the interest rates to equal to or below Scotiabank's own deposit rates and/or exiting this space entirely. Credit card receivable securitization may offer less "spread" but, in terms of funding certainty and less capital outflows/slower capital inflows in the form of deposits, it's much more preferred. In short, they can raise capital very quickly (inside of a month) and, because of the structure, certainty through long-term purchases and then they pay either monthly or semi-annually distributions to unitholders.
Among other deal "highlights":
- New customers who join the Scotiabank Start Right Program (targeted to new immigrants, either temporary- or permanent-residents), which provides new Canadians with a bank account, credit card and other financial services, will receive $50 at Canadian Tire and $50 at Mark's to help them buy every day essentials for life in Canada
- Through Canadian Tire, Scotiabank will offer $500 in Canadian Tire Money to any Canadian Tire Options MasterCard holders who switch or take a new five-year mortgage from Scotiabank
- The CTFS MasterCard portfolio is the 8th largest in Canada (presumably, after #1 ranked TDCT, which owns CUETS Financial, #2 ranked CIBC, #3 ranked Scotiabank, #4 ranked RBC, #5 ranked BMO, #6 ranked Capital One, #7 ranked National Bank of Canada and ahead of small players like Home Trust, ATB Financial and HSBC rounding out the top 10, I'm guessing)
- As well, Canadian Tire Corporation has the option to sell an additional 29% of CTFS (and, through CTFS, Canadian Tire Bank) to Scotiabank within 10 years, giving Scotiabank a 49% stake in CTFS/CTB. Scotiabank also has the right to sell back to Canadian Tire its existing 20% equity stake in 10 years if the deal is not financially and strategically (i.e., they can't successfully acquire new customers and/or isn't financially beneficial) within the same timescale. Given Scotiabank's existing track record of successfully cross-selling multiple Scotiabank products to over 50% of new mortgage customers originated through its mortgage broker channel, coupled with the fact CTFS is already materially profitable and, once Scotiabank owns 49% of it and CTB, should add between $80 and $100 million (assuming zero percent annual growth rate, which of course it won't be - it'll be much higher), as well as the likelihood of additional strategic actions, I think both Canadian Tire and Scotiabank will choose to exercise that option
- Purchase price (for 20% equity stake) is $500 million, valuing the CTFS/CTB division at $2.5 billion (or slightly higher than analysts' estimated $2 billion) and only $500-600 million less than Scotiabank paid for all of ING DIRECT Canada (now Tangerine) so this is a major deal
Now, for my own analysis. I'm a bit surprised Canadian Tire appears to have gotten what they were looking - the option to retain majority control of CTFS. CTFS provides 30% of CTC (Canadian Tire Corporation) net income currently. Selling up to 49% to Scotiabank will reduce that, obviously, but conversely, they're also giving up more than half (potentially all, depending on how the deal is structured) of the funding liability. As well, assuming they sell the additional 29% to Scotiabank, CTFS/CTB essentially becomes an "equal partners" joint venture and, as such, both parties can now cross-sell and market to each other's customer directly, bypassing any National Do Not Call List (which exempts existing customers of a company from adhering to the List). Given that CTFS sold its mortgage and line of credit book a number of years ago to National Bank of Canada, there a host of potential opportunities for Scotiabank in that they can now market, directly in-store or through telephone/e-mail CTC and CTFS customers. Similarly, CTC benefits from new immigrants coming to Canada, which increasingly attracted to Scotiabank versus HSBC (which is in decline) becoming regular retail store customers. As well, potentially we could see other banking products (such as Tangerine) promoted by way of unstaffed "kiosks" (or third-party in-store marketers/merchandisers signing up new banking customers) and even full-service or cash-dispensing Scotiabank ABMs within Canadian Tire stores (in much the same way CIBC has with Loblaw through its PC Financial partnership). Such a move could vault Scotiabank into #1 position, ahead of RBC, in terms of number of ABM locations.
Bottom line: While I am sure there was lots of interest from the major banks, I think Scotiabank won this deal for giving Canadian Tire what it wanted, to retain a substantial contributor to its own bottom line and to reduce its funding liability. That said, because it did so, what you could (and I think likely will) see happen in the coming months to first two years of this "strategic partnership", is Canadian Tire Bank selling its GIC and HISA customers to Scotiabank in much the same way RBC Royal Bank assumed the Ally Canada deposit customers from ResMor Trust Company.
To those looking to consolidate (i.e., close down) some of their existing "virtual" bank accounts, your Canadian Tire Bank accounts would be where I'd start. I see Canadian Tire and Scotiabank promoting Scotiabank and, potentially, Tangerine banking & savings offerings (since Scotiabank is becoming primary funder of the CTFS MasterCard portfolio). I just hope it happens sooner rather than later so we can remove CTB from the "comparison chart".
While it happened differently than I expected, my prediction ultimately came true (and I'll try and give you my 2014 banking predictions later) and I have to say, Scotiabank is really cleaning up in terms of acquisitions of what are, fundamentally, new customer acquisition channels. Think of CTFS as very similar to its joint venture SCENE membership program with Cineplex and you'll truly "get" it.
Cheers,
Doug
7:52 am
June 29, 2013
BNS stock has been a great performer and I believe it is time to buy more of that stock. Every indication is it will continue to be a great performer. The dividend alone just under 4% (plus a dividend tax credit) sure beats daily interest bank acct, GIC rates etc. - and that is not counting the capital gains on these bank shares. Canadian bank shares appear to be a no brainer investment. (NOTE: I am not saying for readers to put ALL their savings into bank shares but putting some of one's saving into bank shares (or similar ETFs) will likely prove a good long-term strategy.)
5:41 pm
October 27, 2013
A dividend stock is not a substitute for fixed income. Regardless of the reliability of the dividend which I concede is almost a sure thing, not many FI investors can tolerate capital swings.
As an example, BNS within the past 52 weeks has risen from a low of $55 to $66, back down to $60 and back to $66 and change. Worse, it went from a high of circa $55 in mid 2007 to a low of circa $25 in late Feb 2009. Explain how to tell someone into capital preservation mode how to handle that roller coaster.
10:15 pm
October 21, 2013
How did the dividends do when the stock value went down in 2007-09?
I have read that companies will try to maintain their dividends if at all possible, and would rather see the stock value go down in tough times, because they want to maintain the financial stability that comes with income-oriented dividend seekers. I don't know how this theory plays out, but that's what I've read.
6:35 am
June 29, 2013
True - Most stocks did go down badly in 2008 - unfortunately people who went into panic and quickly sold at a loss did lose capital for sure - the fact is that most companies were not going under and continued to be profitable and continued to pay dividends. If one bought and owns GOOD stocks for the long term, one must not "panic" and sell low just on emotion.
The reality is that investors who held their stocks through the darkness in 2008 and 2009 etc. did VERY well since then - and did not lose capital - stocks recovered fully and then more. Fixed income investors are having a challenge if they want no risk - returns are historically low - certainly not keeping up with inflation - and in fact capital is being eroded.
However, if one cannot stomach the ups and downs of stocks (and stocks will go up and down due to the economic cycle, politics, etc. etc. etc., they are better off not to invest in them, but buying "quality" stocks has been a proven way to protect capital against inflation over the long term. Right now inflation is low, but in a year or so, once the economy is likely improving (the US economy is already recovering and ours will follow) inflation will start up again.
7:51 am
October 27, 2013
I recognize the value of having 'stayed the course' in 2008/2009 as I held my equities despite a 30% drop in portfolio value at the time, and actually bought opportunities during the dark days of that crisis. That said, dividend yields from bank shares cannot be compared to HISAs or GICs as they are very different investments held for very different reasons.
We would not be trumpeting the 'golden goose' characteristics of Cdn bank shares IF Canadian banks had gone through the same turmoil as big US banks during the 2008/2009 crisis. Many, if not most, US banks had to slash dividend rates almost entirely and they have yet to recover fully. It could happen here too. Had the Cdn banks been allowed to merge by the Feds some 10-15 yrs ago or more, and allowed to play in the same pool as the big US and UK banks (which is what the Cdn bank CEOs wanted to do), Cdn banks could have just as easily been mired in the same murky depths with the same junk investments. That is why equities cannot be compared to CDIC insured deposits.
11:23 am
October 21, 2013
Good point, AltaRed. I well remember the look of glee on Jim Flaherty's face when he proclaimed that Cdn banks were in such excellent shape and that we would therefore weather the storm, as if he'd just discovered a huge pot of gold. Yet it was the Liberals who had refused to allow the bank mergers, which the Conservatives would certainly have done.
And I have no particular feelings for the Liberal party. It's just what happened.
I would still like to know if Cdn bank dividends went down during the financial crisis, if any of you held them during that period. I can't figure out how to find this information retroactively from independent sources.
1:17 pm
June 29, 2013
here is Scotiabank history of dividends - you can easily find same info for the other banks
Would appear that Scotiabank has continued to pay dividends since 1892 and has increased it regularly - as well as stock splits along the way
http://www.scotiabank.com/ca/en/0,,3098,00.html
(ensure you pick up this whole address to insert in your browser - the system seems to drop the last part.)
4:25 pm
June 29, 2013
2.39 is the DOLLAR amount of the dividend in 2013 - not a % of market value. The share value in 2013 started at $57.50 on Jan 1 and ended at $66.43 Dec 31 - so the dividend would represent about 3.99% return on the 2013 average market value. 2.39 / 60 avg mkt value = 3.99%
This year (2014) the dividend is $2.56 per share - which represents approx 3.88% return based on a $66 share value. 2.56 / 66 = 3.88%.
9:36 am
February 22, 2013
Loonie said
Oh, thank you, Brian. That's very helpful. Sorry to be so ignorant, but I find it difficult to find out this kind of info.
When they increase or decrease the dividends, does that happen on some sort of scheduled basis, or just whenever they feel like it?
Google, while not 100% in your corner, is your friend. After reading this thread and your questions, specifically, I "asked" Google "canadian bank stock dividend" and from the resulting 10 returns picked this one which shows all sorts of information. I know nothing about that site, but it appears to pull together a 10 year history of the five biggest banks.
The graph is really interesting -- confirming to me that buying and holding is right for me.
SD used to say "Google it". He was right in that if you ask Google the right "question" and then are selective in what results you use you can do really well.
For Google beginners I like to tell them to research something they already know to build up their confidence.
Greg
7:53 pm
April 6, 2013
Loonie said
When they increase or decrease the dividends, does that happen on some sort of scheduled basis, or just whenever they feel like it?
Dividends, whether to pay them and the amount to pay, are up to the board of directors. There's actually no legal obligation to pay a dividend until the dividend is declared by the board of directors.
Like many other blue chip companies, Scotiabank regularly declares and pays dividends on its common shares quarterly.
As for the amount of each quarterly dividend, this is Scotiabank's dividend philosophy from Scotiabank: Common Share Dividends:
Scotiabank's practice has been to relate dividends to the trend earnings, while ensuring that capital levels are sufficient for both growth and depositor protection.
This practice, coupled with the Bank's strong earnings growth, has led to dividend increases in 42 of the last 45 years - one of the most consistent records for dividend growth among major Canadian corporations
...
The Bank has paid dividends to common shareholders every year since its foundation in 1832.
Please write your comments in the forum.